Unreal!!! Federal Judge Jack B. Weinstein Defending Child Sex Predators, Says Child Porn Laws to Harsh … “We’re destroying lives unnecessarily”

“We’re destroying lives unnecessarily” … Yes we are and it is because judges like Jack B. Weinstein are allowed to serve on the bench. How will we ever protect children, the most defenseless among us with the likes of this as federal judges?

Say hello to LEFTIST Jack B. Weinstein, a 43 year federal judge …

The NY Times states, the judge  has come to be identified by his efforts to combat what he calls “the unnecessary cruelty of the law.” What is his crusade this time … Child Porn laws. However, it’s not what you think … this judge things that the child porn laws are too strict and defends the child pornographers.

Judge Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed “no risk to society.”

There is little public sympathy for collectors of child pornography. Yet across the country, an increasing number of federal judges have come to their defense, criticizing changes to sentencing laws that have effectively quadrupled their average prison term over the last decade.

That is correct, this judge stated that an electronic ankle bracelet was excessive for a sexual predator and child pornographer as he stated that this perv posed no threat to society. UNBELIEVABLE!!!

Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein has held unconstitutional the electronic monitoring of a Brooklyn pizzeria owner awaiting retrial on child pornography charges.

The judge found that the monitoring, mandated by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, constitutes unconstitutionally excessive bail and violates defendant Peter Polouizzi’s procedural due process rights.

Judge Jack B. Weinstein stated “We’re destroying lives unnecessarily.” However, he was not referring to the victims of child porn … he was referring to the child pornographers! I would agree with the Astute Blogger 100%, “I THINK THAT THESE LEFTISTS ARE EVERY BIT AS BAD AND DANGEROUS AS CHILD PORNOGRAPHERS.”

Just what we need to be soft on kiddie porn.  What will the LEFT think of next to defend … child rapists? Guess where child rapists come from liberal judges … that would be the very kiddie porn criminals that you look to let off scott free.

Judge Weinstein has gone to extraordinary lengths to challenge the strict punishments, issuing a series of rulings that directly attack the mandatory five-year prison sentence faced by defendants charged with receiving child pornography.

“I don’t approve of child pornography, obviously,” he said in an interview this week. But, he also said, he does not believe that those who view the images, as opposed to producing or selling them, present a threat to children.

“We’re destroying lives unnecessarily,” he said. “At the most, they should be receiving treatment and supervision.”

Treatment and supervision … how LEFTIST, liberal can we get? Maybe we need to figure out why his parents did not get him a pony for his 6th birthday while we are at it. You know you have a problem with a judge when a child porn collector sees the man as not a judge, but a dad.

The man he has spent three years trying to save from a long incarceration is Pietro Polizzi, a married father of five who collected more than 5,000 graphic pictures of children. If prosecuted in a New York State court, he would have faced a maximum prison sentence of four years. Instead, in federal court, he faced a minimum of five years and a recommended sentence of 11 to 14 years. Because of Judge Weinstein’s intervention, he remains free as he awaits another trial.

“I don’t see Judge Weinstein as a judge,” Mr. Polizzi said during an interview as tears rolled down his face. “I see him as my father. He helps people. He doesn’t destroy lives the way the prosecutor has. He’s the one who is going to set me free from the court.”

It’s too bad that these liberal judges did not feel the need to protect the victims of child porn. News flash Judge Jack B. Weinstein … the pic is of an exploited child and the individual with that pic is a time bomb waiting to go off.

So judge, when this perv escalates his child porn pic collection to the real thing … what will you say then!!!