Convicted Sex Offender, Kenneth Glenn Hinson, Testifies in South Carolina ‘Dungeon’ Rape … “the sex was consensual”
Posted in: Bizarre,Child Welfare,Crime,Sex Offender
Kenneth Glenn Hinson, a convicted sex offender and now on trial in the infamous South Carolina “Dungeon” rape case testified today that the two girls accusing him of rape were lying. Kenneth Glenn Hinson stated, “that the sex was consensual.”
A convicted sex offender accused of raping two teens in a dungeon-like space behind his home testified Saturday that he had sex with both of his accusers hours before the alleged crimes took place.
Kenneth Glenn Hinson said one of the 17-year-old girls then asked him for money.
The girls have testified that Hinson, 48, took them from a bedroom while they slept in March 2006. Prosecutors allege he bound them with duct tape, raped them and left them to die in a small room hidden beneath a tool shed.
Hinson’s attorney has said the girls lied and the sex was consensual.
Hinson testified that the girls asked him to purchase a sexual device about a week before the alleged crimes and, after he did, one of them demonstrated to him how it worked.
(Because ever normal, sane person has a room like this for only good intentions)
Once again a previously convicted sex predator taking no responsibilities for his actions, instead just providing excuses. Hinson had been previously been convicted in 1991 of raping a 12 year old girl. However, in typical fashion a judge allowed this sex offender out against the advice of two review committees. Was it consensual sex with the 12 year old as well?
During an hour of often contentious cross-examination, Kenneth Glenn Hinson reiterated what he told the jury Saturday _ that sex he had with two then 17-year-old girls in March 2006 was consensual and that he hid from police for four days because he thought they wanted him on drug charges. (Washington Post)
When will we ever learn? Why do we continue to allow these predators out on the street to repeat their sick ways on an unsuspecting society? How is a sex offenders rights more important than innocent, law abiding citizens. How is a sex offender provided more rights than innocent children? Maybe we should start prosecuting judges who allow these dirt bags out on the street to harm our children?
As we continue to say, EARTH TO JUDGES … THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A ONE TIME RAPIST!!!
Social Web