Paris Hilton Sues to Shut Down Web Site, ParisExposed.com, that Displayed her Naked photos, Videos, diaries …

Welcome to the Paris Hilton scandal of the month …

Never has a $208 unpaid fee caused so much commotion. Never has a $2775 investment ever been so lucrative without having paid for a lottery ticket and winning Powerball. Nabil and Nabila Haniss paid $2,775 for the contents of Paris Hilton’s storage unit that had a past due balance. According to court documents they sold the contents to Bardia Persa for $10 million. The web site was then launched … ParisExposed.com. (Careful when visiting this site, not work appropriate)

LOS ANGELES -        Paris Hilton filed a federal lawsuit Monday, seeking to shut down a Web site that displays personal photos, videos, diaries, and other belongings once kept at a storage facility.

The Web site was launched last week claiming the items were auctioned off after Hilton neglected to pay the Los Angeles-area storage facility. It also promises visitors who pay a fee of $39.97 access to Hilton’s passport, medical records and other legal documents. (Yahoo News, CNN)

The questions that come into play is an expectation of privacy”. Paris, you will lose this one as the storage facility most likely properly sold the items at auction as per a contract you signed if a storage facility bill goes unpaid. Also, how bizarre a situation is it that a millionaire heiress finds herself in a predicament like this because she did not pay a $208.00 storage fee? Unbelievable.

What rocket scientist has in a storage facility documents, pictures and videos that they know that people would steal let alone pay for for their own personal gain? Paris Hilton is that rocket scientist.

Court documents and law suit can be found HERE.

What’s that expression about closing the barn door only after all of the horses, cows and pigs have already gotten loose?

Here is the comic relief part of the lawsuit filed by Paris Hilton. The law suit claims “irreparable harm to her reputation”.  Hasn’t Paris already caused irreparable harm to herself with past naked tapes gone public, drunk diving, etc? Reputation, hell … hasn’t naked pictures and videos become her reputation? One would say that this is all that Paris Hilton has become but an internet driven PR machine due to her misbehaving. It certainly wasn’t her singing or acting in ‘House of Wax’.

The suit claims that the site could cause irreparable harm to Hilton’s reputation, but also adds that having the more private information available to the public could make it easier for people to “steal Hilton’s identity, or even worse, to talk and even physically harm Hilton.”