91% of Coverage on Evening Newscasts was Negative to Donald Trump

YEAH, THERE IS NO MEDIA BIAS IS THERE, HILLARY CLINTON HAS DONE FAR WORSE THAT WATERGATE AND NIXON, MSM SAYS NOTHING TO REPORT HERE …

From The Politico comes their report from the MRC Study that shows that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has received significantly more broadcast network news coverage than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, but nearly all of that coverage (91%) has been hostile. Imagine that, but of course there is no media bias. How is that possible when the Wikileaks emails consistently show more and more wrong doing and exposed Hillary Clinton for the lying, deceitful and corrupt individual that she is? The Wikileaks emails all but proved every conspiracy that the right claimed against her. However, the media refused to cover anything bad against Hillary. Instead they acted more to defend lying, crooked Hillary. even those at FOX News have joined in the piling on of Trump.

Is the American public actually paying attention and have they finally gotten fed up with the bias and double standard of the media? It is truly shameful that we have come to this point where a media has become nothing more than a propaganda tool for one party.

A whopping 91 percent of news coverage about Donald Trump on the three broadcast nightly newscasts over the past 12 weeks has been ‘hostile’, a new study finds.

The study, conducted by the conservative Media Research Center, found that not only has Trump received significantly more broadcast network news coverage than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, but nearly all of that coverage (91%) has been hostile, according to the study.

In addition, the networks spent far more airtime focusing on the personal controversies involving Trump, such as his treatment of women, than controversies surrounding Clinton, such as her email practices or the Clinton Foundation.

For the study, MRC analyzed all 588 evening news stories that either discussed or mentioned the presidential campaign on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from July 29 through October 20 (including weekends). Of the total newscasts, the networks devoted 29 percent of their time to the campaign. The study did not include comments from the campaigns or candidates themselves, instead focusing on what the correspondents, anchors, expert commentators, and voters on the street said in order to try and hone in on any sort of slant from the networks.

For the study, MRC analyzed all 588 evening news stories that either discussed or mentioned the presidential campaign on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from July 29 through October 20 (including weekends). Of the total newscasts, the networks devoted 29 percent of their time to the campaign. The study did not include comments from the campaigns or candidates themselves, instead focusing on what the correspondents, anchors, expert commentators, and voters on the street said in order to try and hone in on any sort of slant from the networks.

Though neither candidate was necessarily celebrated, Clinton largely just stayed out of the line of fire.

“Even when they were critical of Hillary Clinton — for concealing her pneumonia, for example, or mischaracterizing the FBI investigation of her e-mail server — network reporters always maintained a respectful tone in their coverage,” the study found. “This was not the case with Trump, who was slammed as embodying “the politics of fear,” or a “dangerous” and “vulgar” “misogynistic bully” who had insulted vast swaths of the American electorate.”