Wikileaks Emails Confirm Media in Hillary Clinton’s Pocket, Their Bias and a Rigged System

IT HAS FINALLY PASSED THE POINT OF NO RETURN, MEDIA IS SO IN THE TANK FOR DEMOCRAT PARTY AND HILLARY CLINTON … DEBATE AND REPORTING ON CANDIDATES SHOWS ITS NOTHING MORE THAN A BIAS, RIGGED SYSTEM …

The emails released by Wikileaks show one common theme, well actually two. One, the emails confirm that the media is in the tank for Hillary Clinton. Not only was the MSM in Hillary Clinton’s pocket, but so was the DNC, who is supposed to be neutral. However, the hacked emails exposed to the public show just how bias the media and DNC were for Hillary. They made a concerted effort to coronation Hillary the Democrat presidential nominee. With all this collusion for Hillary, it makes one wonder how she had as much difficulty against Sanders. One would think that Bernie Sanders’ supporters would be pissed off as they were played like a fiddle by the MSM and DNC. What else does the Wikileaks email show … the MSM is in full cover up mode for Hillary Clinton as they refuse to cover the news of the emails. The network news refuses to report on the news in an effort to protect Hillary Clinton and the fact that Team Hillary, the media and the DNC colluded to defeat Sanders in the Democrat primary. Shameful.

On October 12, WikiLeaks released part four and five of Clinton campaign Chair John Podesta’s emails, with part six to be released on October 13, and part seven to follow on October 14.

“As soon as the nomination is wrapped up, I will be your biggest surrogate,” current Interim Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Donna Brazile, wrote to Podesta in a January 2016 email. As a Vice Chair of the DNC, Brazile was bound to neutrality per the charter, but as shown in several emails released so far, that was not the case.

“I pushed back hard on this, and Axe. So weird to attack the kids the night before the first primary,” Brazile wrote in an email she forwarded to Podesta about what CNN was doing while she served as a CNN contributor.

On October 10, an email was released that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to an outreach campaign being conducted by the Sanders campaign. Brazile defended herself on Twitter claiming she also sent the Sanders campaign “advice,” but did not release or cite any examples.

On October 11, Mediaite’s Jordan Chariton first reported another email that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to a question on the death penalty that would be asked at a CNN Town Hall the next day. Brazile was a CNN contributor at the time, and that wasn’t her only helpful tip. “For the debate team,” she wrote in a March email about the Voting Rights Act, forwarded to Podesta.

More bias …the fix was in for Hillary over Bernie Sanders.

In 2013, during an interview with ABC News, Brazile said, “if Clinton gets in the race, there will be a coronation of her,” foreshadowing that she and the rest of the DNC and Democratic Party would line up behind Hillary Clinton as the nominee before a single person voted in the Democratic primaries.

Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress which publishes Think Progress, wrote in a January 2016 email, “But I should say that I would do whatever Hillary needs always. I owe her a lot. And I’m a loyal soldier.”

An April 2015 email describes the Clinton campaign and DNC coordinating to rig the debate schedule for Clinton’s benefit. The debate schedule was a commonly cited criticism against then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who resigned after the WikiLeaks release of DNC emails in July showed her overt favoritism for Clinton all through the primaries.

“Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina)” read the email from Charlie Baker, a senior advisor to the Clinton campaign from the Dewey Square Group. “The other campaigns have advocated (not surprisingly) for more debates and for the schedule to start significantly earlier.”