CNN has become nothing more than a political Super Pac for Hillary Clinton …
As Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers sink, Democrats and the liberal MSM have become more and more concerned. So much so that CNN willfully, purposely and falsely added the word “racially” to Donald Trump’s comments as he discussed on FOX News how Israel uses profiling to deal with terrorism and immigration. As seen in the screen shot below, CNN falsely added the it and even put it in quotes as if Trump really said the words. However, upon review of the transcripts and the video, Donald Trump never said any such thing. He said, “profiling”. But this is what a desperate MSM does who is in the tank for Hillary Clinton and sees her election chances slipping away. But of course there is no media bias or double standard. Shame on the MSM for not doing their jobs and vetting all candidates.
“You know in Israel, they profile They’ve done an unbelievable job — as good as you can do. But Israel has done an unbelievable job. And they’ll profile. They profile. They see somebody that’s suspicious. They will profile. They will take that person in. They will check out.”
CNN added the word “racial” to Donald Trump’s Monday comments on terrorism and immigration, and is running headlines reporting that the GOP nominee is advocating “racial profiling”.
But a review of the transcript of Trump’s comments to Fox News that CNN quoted, however, shows that Trump never put the word “racial” in front of “profiling.”
“You know in Israel, they profile,” Trump said Monday to Fox News. “They’ve done an unbelievable job — as good as you can do. But Israel has done an unbelievable job. And they’ll profile. They profile. They see somebody that’s suspicious. They will profile. They will take that person in. They will check out.”
Forward to the 3:00 mark for the actual comments Trump made.
In a later interview with Bill O’Reilly, Trump also expressed a need to profile in the manner Israel does, but again didn’t use the word “racial.” But when pressed by O’Reilly how it could be determined how a person could be deemed suspicious, Trump wouldn’t elaborate.
“It works. If we see somebody that we think could be a problem at airports and other places you talk to them and you see what’s going on. We don’t do that. Not much.”
CNN has been running headlines throughout the day that specifically quotes Trump as saying “racial profiling” and the Fox News excerpts the network sent out Monday evening also framed his quotes as responses to questions about “racial profiling.”
The Daily Caller references other examples where CNN did some selective editing to help Hillary.
I GUESS THIS IS MORE OF HILLARY CLINTON BEING FOR THE LITTLE GUY … REPEATEDLY OVERCHARGING DONORS WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.
The Observer is reporting that the Hillary Clinton campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website. According to the report, her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100. And why is that? Because as a fraud expert explains, “We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100.” They went on to say, “the Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100.” As BPR opines, Apparently donating to Hillary’s campaign with a credit card is, “the gift that’ll keep on giving, and giving, and giving, even without your consent!”
Hillary Clinton’s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website, multiple sources tell the Observer.
The overcharges are occurring so often that the fraud department at one of the nation’s biggest banks receives up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton’s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton’s campaign. One elderly Clinton donor, who has been a victim of this fraud scheme, has filed a complaint with her state’s attorney general and a representative from the office told her that they had forwarded her case to the Federal Election Commission.
“We get up to a hundred calls a day from Hillary’s low-income supporters complaining about multiple unauthorized charges,” a source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of job security, from the Wells Fargo fraud department told the Observer. The source claims that the Clinton campaign has been pulling this stunt since Spring of this year. The Hillary for America campaign will overcharge small donors by repeatedly charging small amounts such as $20 to the bankcards of donors who made a one-time donation. However, the Clinton campaign strategically doesn’t overcharge these donors $100 or more because the bank would then be obligated to investigate the fraud.
“We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100,” the fraud specialist explained. “The Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100. We’ll see her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100.” The source, who has worked for Wells Fargo for over 10 years, said that the total amount they refund customers on a daily basis who have been overcharged by Clinton’s campaign “varies” but the bank usually issues refunds that total between $700 and $1200 per day.
Don’t the Little People who support Hillary understand this is how the pay for play system works with Hillary and the Clinton Foundation/Campaign?
ARE YOU KIDDING … TEEN SUES PARENTS FOR POSTING EMBARRASSING PICS ON FACEBOOK WITHOUT HER CONSENT …
In an age of social media narcissism where teens do nothing but post embarrassing pics of themselves, an 18 year old Austrian teen is suing her parents for posting photos of her without her consent. The teen claims that since 2009 they have made her life a misery by constantly posting photos of her, including embarrassing and intimate images from her childhood. It is the first of it’s kind case in Austria. No kidding? Why does this sound more like the whining nature of today’s immature millennials who can’t seem to cope with anything and think they can sue for being uncomfortable? Believe it or not, if it can be proven that the images have violated the teen’s rights to a personal life, her parents could lose the case and they could have to pay some financial compensation for her pain and suffering, and will also be liable for her legal costs. UNREAL. According to accounts, when the teen girl asked her parents to take them down, they refused. She stated, “I’m tired of not being taken seriously by my parents.” BINGO!!! There lies the issue. A frivolous lawsuit because a teen feels slighted by her parents.
A 18-year-old woman from Carinthia is suing her parents for posting photos of her on Facebook without her consent.
She claims that since 2009 they have made her life a misery by constantly posting photos of her, including embarrassing and intimate images from her childhood.
Her lawyer Michael Rami says that to date, her parents have posted 500 images of her on the social media site without her consent, and he believes she has a good chance of winning in court.
The shared images include baby pictures of her having her nappy changed and later potty training pictures.
“They knew no shame and no limit – and didn’t care whether it was a picture of me sitting on the toilet or lying naked in my cot – every stage was photographed and then made public,” the 18-year-old said. The photos were shared on Facebook with her parents’ 700 friend.
Despite her requests, they have refused to delete the photos – prompting her to sue them. “I’m tired of not being taken seriously by my parents”, she said. Her father believes that since he took the photos he has the right to publish the images.
Media Bias: CBS News Edits Out Embarrassing “Frequently” Verbal Slip in Bill Clinton Interview Discussing Hillary Clinton’s Health Issues
Once again the liberal MSM shows their bias and caught carrying the water for Democrat Hillary Clinton …
We reported on this yesterday that former president Bill Clinton made the comment that his wife, Hillary Clinton, had “frequent,” oh he meant “rarely” medical episodes similar to what happened on Sunday that say her shaking in what looked like a neurological episode, then collapsing. However, the bias liberal media managed to edit the “frequent” comments from the interview claiming it was for time. Please. we believe that one as much as we do that Hillary has pneumonia.
It is pathetic that the media feels the need to have to so be in the tank for a candidate. Just pathetic. The fact that the MSM now is in full talking points mode with the “over-heating” and “pneumonia” spin, even though it was a low humidity day and in the low 80′s on Sunday in New York.
Clinton sat down with Charlie Rose Monday afternoon in an interview that aired later that evening. As the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross noticed, this is what the CBS News’s website reported Clinton said when asked about his wife’s recent health issues.
Asked if there was any chance her faintness on Sunday could be a sign of some more “serious” illness, Clinton said he did not believe that was the case.
“Well if it is, it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors,” he said, “because frequently—well not frequently, rarely—but on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing happened to her when she got severely dehydrated.”
The bolded section is of course a pretty embarrassing slip-up: Clinton was about to say that Hillary “frequently” faints or collapses, before correcting himself to say it rarely happened.
But when the segment aired Monday night, the bolded section was edited out, cutting to a reverse shot of Rose nodding to cover up the jump:
“Well if it is, it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors. Rarely—but on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing happened to her when she got severely dehydrated.”
Hillary Clinton Admits She Has Fainted “A Few Times” Can’t Remember … Bill Clinton Says “Because frequently” When Describing Medical Issue
HILLARY CLINTON ADMITS SHE HAS FAINTED IN THE PAST BUT CAN’T REMEMBER HOW MANY TIMES!!!
Over the course of her life she pas passed out from dehydration? Wait a minute, this has obviously happened before as we have seen it happen more than once in the last couple of years. How the hell was the follow up question not … WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH? This is obviously not a pneumonia issue. Hillary Clinton just said this has happened in the past. During the interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper she claimed didn’t think pneumonia was a big deal. Well of course she didn’t, because she does not have pneumonia.
Sorry America, her lying alone disqualifies her to be president, but her health issue do above all. The United States of America cannot have a person as president with such a medical issue where you never know when she is going to pass out and faint.
Bill Clinton’s attempt on Monday at downplaying his wife’s recent fainting spell may have backfired.
During an interview with CBS News’ Charlie Rose, the former president said that Hillary Clinton has “on more than one occasion” had a fainting episode after becoming “severely dehydrated.”
Rose asked Bill Clinton if the episode indicates that his wife has more serious medical issues.
“Well if it is, it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors,” he responded.
“Because frequently,” Clinton began, according to CBS’ website, before correcting himself, “well not frequently, rarely — but on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing happened to her when she got severely dehydrated.”
“She’s doing fine, she was even better last night before she went to sleep,” he continued.
Clinton’s “frequently” slip is not included in CBS’s broadcast of the interview.