Hillary Clinton Willfully Enabled and Defended Bill Clinton’s Many Affairs and Trashed the Women as “Bimbos & Liars” Who Were Telling the Truth

TURNS OUT HILLARY CLINTON WAS A ‘STAND BY YOUR MAN WOMAN’ AT ALL COSTS FOR HER POLITICAL CAREER AND DIDN’T CARE WHAT WOMAN SHE TRASHED …

From The New York Times, comes the following article of how Hillary Clinton ruthlessly grappled with Bill Clinton’s many infidelities, and his female accusers, who she trashed and tried to brand as “bimbos” and a “pathological liars.” But just who turned out to be the pathological liar? That would be Hillary Clinton of course. The New York Times penned this article, not the vast right wing conspiracy. It shows the lengths that Hillary Clinton was willing to go to trash those woman, who were telling the truth, who had affairs with Bill Clinton. Why? Because Hillary Clinton’s entire life’s ambition was to run for president and she needed a man, Bill Clinton, to springboard off of. The truth of the matter could not be more stated than at Town Hall, that writes … ‘Why No Self-Respecting Woman Can Vote for Hillary.’

Hillary Clinton is the very opposite of the smart, independent female role model once hoped-for as the first woman president. For nearly five decades she has defended her serial predator and accused rapist husband whose despicable behavior she denied while behind the scenes she viciously trashed his victims and often ruined their lives. Hillary conducted her own personal war on women against the very same women her own husband had already savaged. And now she wants us to believe her whole life has been about helping women and children.

Hillary and Slick Willie’s top staff convened strategy meetings to squelch what their team called “bimbo eruptions” before and during his presidency. Kathleen Willey, an attractive campaign volunteer who accused Bill of sexual assault, recalled some of their tactics in a 2000 press conference announcing she was suing the then-president, First Lady Hillary, and White House aides because of “their efforts to intimidate and harass me.”

What a crock of BS … She was exactly a stand by her man woman at all cost for her political aspirations

Hillary Clinton was campaigning for her husband in January 1992 when she learned of the race’s newest flare-up: Gennifer Flowers had just released tapes of phone calls with Bill Clinton to back up her claim they had had an affair.

Other candidates had been driven out of races by accusations of infidelity. But now, at a cold, dark airfield in South Dakota, Mrs. Clinton was questioning campaign aides by phone and vowing to fight back on behalf of her husband.

“Who’s tracking down all the research on Gennifer?” she asked, according to a journalist traveling with her at the time.

She has a track history of insulting woman

New York Times:

The enduring image of Mrs. Clinton from that campaign was a “60 Minutes” interview in which she told the country she was not blindly supporting her husband out of wifely duty. “I’m not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette,” she said.

But stand by she did, holding any pain or doubts in check as the campaign battled to keep the Clintons’ political aspirations alive.

Last week, Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, criticized Mrs. Clinton over Mr. Clinton’s affairs and her response to them, and said he might talk more about the issue in the final weeks before the election.

That could be a treacherous strategy for Mr. Trump, given his own past infidelity and questionable treatment of women. Many voters, particularly women, might see Mrs. Clinton being blamed for her husband’s conduct.

Hillary Clinton calls Bill Clinton’s sexual assault victims “Bimbo Eruptions”

It could also remind voters of a searing period in American history, and in Mrs. Clinton’s life.

Confronting a spouse’s unfaithfulness is painful under any circumstance. For Mrs. Clinton, it happened repeatedly and in the most public of ways, unfolding at the dawn of the 24/7 news cycle, and later in impeachment proceedings that convulsed the nation.

Outwardly, she remained stoic and defiant, defending her husband while a progression of women and well-funded conservative operatives accused Mr. Clinton of behavior unbecoming the leader of the free world.

But privately, she embraced the Clinton campaign’s aggressive strategy of counterattack: Women who claimed to have had sexual encounters with Mr. Clinton would become targets of digging and discrediting — tactics that women’s rights advocates frequently denounce.

The campaign hired a private investigator with a bare-knuckles reputation who embarked on a mission, as he put it in a memo, to impugn Ms. Flowers’s “character and veracity until she is destroyed beyond all recognition.”

In a pattern that would later be repeated with other women, the investigator’s staff scoured Arkansas and beyond, collecting disparaging accounts from ex-boyfriends, employers and others who claimed to know Ms. Flowers, accounts that the campaign then disseminated to the news media.

By the time Mr. Clinton finally admitted to “sexual relations” with Ms. Flowers, years later, Clinton aides had used stories collected by the private investigator to brand her as a “bimbo” and a “pathological liar.”

Clinton on Flowers ’1992  … LIES

Wikileaks’ October Surprise Planned by Julian Assange on Tuesday in Video Appearance After First Canceling Due to Security Concerns

JUST WHAT DOES WIKILEAKS HAVE AS AN ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ FOR HILLARY CLINTON?

After having canceled his first appearance due to security concerns, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is now planning to appear via video link Tuesday morning at Wikileak’s tenth anniversary celebration in Berlin, Germany. According to Heat Street, Assange may be planning to release some new information his organization has obtained about the U.S. Democratic Party; however, it is unknown whether he will dump the dirt on Hillary Clinton. Originally, Assange was to make an announcement from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years, but was canceled due to security concerns.

After canceling a planned announcement in London, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is now planning to appear via video link Tuesday morning at Wikileak’s tenth anniversary celebration in Berlin. He’s a last-minute addition to the roster of festivities taking place this week in Germany.

Wikileaks used its Facebook page to confirm that Assange would speak at the event, which takes place at 3am Eastern time.

Sources close to the event tell Heat Street that Assange may be planning to release some new information his organization has obtained about the U.S. Democratic Party. But Heat Street has yet to receive independent confirmation that Assange plans to dump information specifically on Hillary Clinton.

The news that Assange plans to appear (remotely) in Berlin comes after Wikileaks abruptly canceled a much-anticipated announcement in London that was to be made from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years. The cancelation was first reported by NBC News. According to NBC’s Jesse Rodriguez, the announcement was canceled due to “security concerns”.

There had been widespread anticipating that Tuesday’s announcement might have been Assange’s long-promised document dump on Hillary Clinton.

Just what does Julian Assange have on Hillary Clinton and will it derail her presidential campaign? Previously, Assange stated that he had “enough evidence” to indict Hillary Clinton. Everyone is awaiting this political bombshell and ‘October Surprise.’ A top Donald Trump supporter ominously declared that Wednesday will be the end for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. If Assange truly has the goods on Hillary Clinton and Democrats and does sway the presidential election for Donald Trump, my prediction is that Julian Assange will be names Time. Man of the Year.’

US Attorney Investigating Anthony Weiner Sexting Allegations with 15 Year Old Girl

ANTHONY WEINER GOES FROM PERVY DISGRACE TO POSSIBLE SEX OFFENDER …. CARLOS DANGER IN BIG TROUBLE.

As if it was not bad enough that Anthony Weiner had previously disgraced himself with his previous sexting exploits, Weiner now finds himself in a world of trouble and possible criminal charges after having knowingly sexted with a 15 year old female minor. The Daily Mail broke the story of Anthony Weiner’s online sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl during which she claims he asked her to dress up in ‘school-girl’ outfits for him on a video messaging application and pressed her to engage in ‘rape fantasies’. YIKES! This dude is one sick puppy. According to accounts, Weiner knew she was a 15 year old high school sophomore.

• A high school girl, whose name is being withheld by DailyMail.com because she is a minor, reveals the online relationship began last January
• Weiner and Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s top aide, were still together
• He told the teen that it had been a year since he and Huma had sex
• The girl says she told him she was 15 and a sophomore in high school; messages confirm he knew she was underage
• In one message Weiner tells the girl ‘I would bust that tight p***y’
• She claims Weiner asked her to undress and encouraged her to touch herself and say his name over video chat
• Weiner would not get fully nude, but usually shirtless and wearing boxers
• Weiner did not deny exchanging ‘flirtatious’ messages with the teen to DailyMail.com.  He declined to comment on the specifics.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D.) said Weiner’s activities could land him in jail. Gee, you think? It is a sex crime isn’t it with a minor?

CNN:

Prosecutors in the office of US Attorney Preet Bharara have issued a subpoena for Anthony Weiner’s cell phone and other records, according to law enforcement officials.
The FBI and the New York Police Department have opened preliminary investigations of allegations that the former New York Democratic congressman exchanged sexually explicit text messages with a purportedly underage girl.

Spokespersons for the US Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and the FBI declined to comment.

The allegations first surfaced in the Daily Mail.

The online sexting relationship allegedly went on for months between Weiner and a girl claiming to be just 15. The Daily Mail reported she said he sent her numerous photos, one of him in a pool and at least one bare-chested.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office has issued a subpoena for Weiner’s phone records after sexting with a minor.

MOJO: Top 10 Reasons Why a Hillary Clinton Presidency Isn’t Guaranteed (VIDEO)

Hmm, Watch Mojo actually has one of their Top 10′s for Hillary not guaranteed the presidency.

This was created prior to the Democrat and Republican nominees were picked. However, what isn’t included in this was all the lies and obvious crimes Hillary has been caught in with regards to the use of her private emails and the use of a private email server. Which makes her even more unelectable.

MOJO needs to update their VIDEO with the following:

1. The fact that Hillary cannot stay upright and has an obvious neurological issue.
2. She can’t seem to tell the truth.
3. Private email and private server scandal while Secretary of State.
4. Secretary of State and Clinton Foundation conflict of interest.
5. Deplorable’s comment

Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors Over and Over and Over

I GUESS THIS IS MORE OF HILLARY CLINTON BEING FOR THE LITTLE GUY … REPEATEDLY OVERCHARGING DONORS WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.

The Observer is reporting that the Hillary Clinton campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website. According to the report, her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100. And why is that? Because as a fraud expert explains, “We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100.” They went on to say, “the Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100.” As BPR opines, Apparently donating to Hillary’s campaign with a credit card is, “the gift that’ll keep on giving, and giving, and giving, even without your consent!”

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website, multiple sources tell the Observer.

The overcharges are occurring so often that the fraud department at one of the nation’s biggest banks receives up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton’s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton’s campaign. One elderly Clinton donor, who has been a victim of this fraud scheme, has filed a complaint with her state’s attorney general and a representative from the office told her that they had forwarded her case to the Federal Election Commission.

“We get up to a hundred calls a day from Hillary’s low-income supporters complaining about multiple unauthorized charges,” a source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of job security, from the Wells Fargo fraud department told the Observer. The source claims that the Clinton campaign has been pulling this stunt since Spring of this year. The Hillary for America campaign will overcharge small donors by repeatedly charging small amounts such as $20 to the bankcards of donors who made a one-time donation. However, the Clinton campaign strategically doesn’t overcharge these donors $100 or more because the bank would then be obligated to investigate the fraud.

“We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100,” the fraud specialist explained. “The Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100. We’ll see her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100.” The source, who has worked for Wells Fargo for over 10 years, said that the total amount they refund customers on a daily basis who have been overcharged by Clinton’s campaign “varies” but the bank usually issues refunds that total between $700 and $1200 per day.

Don’t the Little People who support Hillary understand this is how the pay for play system works with Hillary and the Clinton Foundation/Campaign?