The Confrontation Between Megyn Kelly and Newt Gingrich Revisited … In Retrospect Newt was 100% Correct & Megyn Has Some Apologizing to Do
REMEMBER WHEN SNARK FILLED MEGYN KELLY SAID TO NEWT … YOU THINK HE IS GOING TO WIN PENNSYLVANIA?!?
We will be discussing the winners and losers of the 2016 elections in the near future, and there were many on both sides. One such loser of the presidential campaign cycle was Megyn Kelly. Remember the VIDEO below and the interview between Megyn and Newt Gingrich that turned into a free-for-all? Gingrich was amazed at the media bias that only cared about sex and not the treasure trove of WikiLeaks emails that shows Clinton, Democrat and MSM collusion ans scandal.
In the heated discussion know-it-all Megyn Kelly could not get her head around the fact that Newt Gingrich was suggesting that there were two alternate universes in play with the electorate in America. One, all the so-called independence pollsters and two, what they were seeing on the ground and their own internal Trump polling. Whether you like Newt or not, he is a brilliant mind and knows his stuff. He has experienced it, he reads, sees and breaths it. Megyn Kelly, not so much. She is fed her information by producers. I have to look back and watch this VIDEO as Megyn Kelly was 100% incorrect in all of her analysis, comments and opinions. She was so jaded in her opinion of Trump that she could never admit to the possibility. The one thing one first learns in the world of politics is you never say never. Megyn Kelly acts all snarky and like she is the most intelligent person in the room with the discussion of whether Trump could win Pennsylvania. Because all the polls said he couldn’t, Megyn jumped on the band wagon. Guess what America, Donald Trump won the state of Pennsylvania and the keystone to his presidential victory.
I think Megyn owes Newt an apology and just curious .. how do you like your crow prepared?
Megyn Kelly transcripts: “The Kelly File,” October 25, 2016.
KELLY: So, I mean, with Cook and many other non-partisan Independent pollsters now saying that the Senate is likely lost to the Republicans, what does that say? I mean if Donald Trump loses this White House race and the Republicans lose the Senate, does that suggest that the Republicans nominated the wrong candidate at the top of their ticket?
GINGRICH: Well, look. The next two weeks are a contest of two parallel universes. I just listened to that report. First of all, I used to hang out with Charlie Cook when he would explain that Donald Trump was hopeless and would not get the nomination. I like Charlie. That doesn’t mean he’s infallible. But let’s take the report we just got. Republicans are actually outvoting Democrats in Florida, they’re outvoting Democrats in Pennsylvania, that’s unprecedented. They’ve cut the Democratic leads —
KELLY: You predict a win in Pennsylvania.
GINGRICH: I think they might.
KELLY: Really? You think Trump is going to win Pennsylvania? (post election added: Pennsylvania: Clinton 47.6% Trump 48.8%)
GINGRICH: Look, all I can report you right now is they’re outvoting the Democrats in early voting which is also true in Florida which is unprecedented.
KELLY: But all of the polls in Pennsylvania have her winning.
KELLY: All of the polls in Pennsylvania have her ahead.
GINGRICH: I know. I just told you, we have two alternative universes right now. In Iowa, for example, the Democrats are 50,000 votes behind where they were with Barack Obama in turnout. The governor is very confident we’re going to carry Iowa which Obama carried last time. I think this carries through case after case like this. In Minnesota, we’re almost certainly going to win the Congressional seat — Duluth which is a very Democratic area but it deeply dislikes Hillary Clinton.
KELLY: But let me just ask you, let me just ask you because you say it’s two alternate universes.
KELLY: I mean, these are sort of small examples of how he might be ahead in early voting and so on. But I’m telling you that the Fox News Decision Desk just moved Iowa that you just mentioned, Indiana, second Congressional district in Maine, all of them moved left, moved more likely to vote for Hillary Clinton. And in fact, all of the moves that have been on this map over the past three weeks by Larry Sabato, by Cook, by the Fox News Decision Desk. These are nonpartisan outlets that are just trying to call the electoral scoreboard --
(Added post election: Iowa (6) Clinton 42.2% Trump 51.8% … good call Fox News)
GINGRICH: Non-partisan outlets. Every outlet you described is part of the establishment.
KELLY: FOX News? Really? Are we? I don’t think so.
GINGRICH: Come on!
KELLY: And every state they’ve moved, they’ve moved it to the left, towards Hillary. And you tell me whether that’s all made up.
GINGRICH: No, I mean, there are two alternative universes. You have a poll which suggests that she’s going to get a Barack Obama turnout among African-Americans. I don’t think that’s going to happen. You have a Washington Post, ABC News poll where they took out eight percent of the vote because they didn’t like the way it voted. Look, I’ve been around long enough. I remember when the Detroit liberal newspaper on the Sunday before the election said John Angler would lose by 14 points. He won the governorship that year. I don’t take polls as seriously as people who have never run for office. I can tell you.
KELLY: But your candidate loves them and has touted them from the beginning. And he’s been behind in virtually every one, out of the last 40 polls that we’ve seen over the past month. That is the reality.
GINGRICH: If you want to assume the election is over, skip the next two weeks.
KELLY: I’m not assuming anything. I’m asking you whether you believe your candidate is behind based on these numbers and what it says about the down ballot races.
GINGRICH: I believe the odds are at least one in three and maybe better than that. But the difference in intensity and the difference in determination and the degree to which Hillary Clinton is clearly the most corrupt dishonest person ever nominated by a party. All mean that the odds are pretty good she’s not going to win. And I actually believe that. This is not just because I’m for Donald Trump. I actually believe the American people are sickened by this.
The Left Loses Thier Minds … Chris Matthews on Trump Protests: What Kind Of Statement Is There To Make? They Lost
THE LEFT BETTER GET THEIR PRESCRIPTIONS OF XANAX FILLED BEFORE OBAMACARE IS SCRAPPED …
The LEFT is still losing their collective minds as they cannot come to grips that they lost and Donald Trump is the president-elect. To see their constant angst and whining just shows how bias they truly are and were and how in the tank they were for Hillary Clinton.
Donna Brazile Says ‘My Conscience is Very Clear’ after the Former CNN Contributor & Current DNC Chair Donna Brazile Sent Even More Debate Questions to Hillary Clinton
MORE EVIDENCE OF THE CORRUPT COLLUSION BETWEEN THE MSM AND HILLARY CLINTON … LET’S GET ONE THINK CLEAR DONNA, YOU HAVE NO CONSCIENCE …
MEDIA BIAS, YA THINK? According to more Wikileaks emails released showed that Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile, the former CNN contributor, sent even more debate questions from a CNN town hall to the Clinton campaign. The total that we know of now is at four. Brazile was let go by CNN; however, do we honestly think that CNN, the Clinton News Network, was not in the tank for Hillary? Of course they were no matter what claims they say of outrage. They were caught red-handed colluding with Team Hillary. When first confronted, she denied she had done any wrong doing. Now, being caught for the fourth time colluding with Hillary Clinton while she was a so-called impartial member of the media and DNC, Donna Brazile says, “my conscience is very clear.” What more do you need America to understand that the MSM and Hillary Clinton fix has been in from the outset. Bernie Sanders supporters, your candidate never had a chance and he was screwed. By the associative property, so were you. Brazile said she had no regrets … WHAT!!! You committed an unethical act like this and no regrets? Take a good look America what life will look like under Hillary Clinton.
No regrets after they lie, cheat, steal and mislead the American public
Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile has already lost her contributor contract with CNN for leaking questions from a CNN town hall to the Clinton campaign. Monday night’s WikiLeaks release of emails from the personal account of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta reveals Brazile sent even more questions ahead of the event, one that went to Hillary Clinton, the other was asked of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
On the day before the event, Brazile sent the following under the heading “UNIONS.”
Secretary Clinton, yesterday in St. Louis, you spoke at carpenters and others “who built this nation.” Both you and Senator Sanders depend on big union support. President Obama pushed for a massive infrastructure bill that would mean millions of jobs for in this area. Yet many of these trade unions have locked out Blacks and other minorities for years. Will you call a meeting with them before November, and if you win, when you are president, to demand that the trade unions stop freezing Blacks and others from these good paying jobs?
The official transcript of the town hall on CNN’s website has Roland Martin, one of the moderators, saying:
Secretary Clinton, yesterday you were in St. Louis, and you talked about carpenters and the rebuilding of the country, the folks who built this nation.
And, both you and Senator Sanders have significant union support, yet many of the trade unions that — we walk about built the country, they’ve locked out black folks and other minorities for decades. Would you, even right now, and even as president, call a meeting with the trade unions and say it’s time for you to open up those doors and bring in more African-Americans and Hispanics, and others be because those are high-paying jobs. And, if we keep saying rebuild America with a huge infrastructure and billions of dollars, they’re the ones who are going to do it. And, black folks and others are going to be left on the outside looking in.
WIKILEAKS Exposes CNN/DNC Collusion … CNN is Busted for Getting Complete List of Questions for Trump Interview from DNC
THIS FROM THE NETWORK WHERE DONNA BRAZILE GAVE TEAM HILLARY DEBATE QUESTIONS AND THEY CLAIMED THEY KNEW NOTHING …
A NEW LOW, EVEN FOR CNN … They don’t call CNN the Clinton New Network for nothing. In newly released emails from Wikileaks, it appears the Democratic National Committee (DNC) colluded with CNN in devising questions in April to be asked of then-Republican primary candidate Donald Trump in an upcoming interview. Because this is ethical and legal. It has long been suspected that the MSM and Democrats were in bed together, now through the thanks of Wikileaks it has been proved to be 100% correct. The media and the Democrat party is one in the same. This comes on the wake of CNN cutting all ties with Donna Brazile for the debate question information she provided to Team Hillary ahead of the debates. CNN cried crocodile tears as they pretended to be outraged by the actions.
What we have learned in this election , the MSM can never be trusted again.
Newly released emails from WikiLeaks suggest that the Democratic National Committee colluded with CNN in devising questions in April to be asked of then-Republican primary candidate Donald Trump in an upcoming interview.
In an email to DNC colleagues on April 25 with the headline “Trump Questions for CNN,” a DNC official with the email username DillonL@dnc.org asked for ideas for an interview to be conducted by CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer.
“Wolf Blitzer is interviewing Trump on Tues ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed. … Please send me thoughts by 10:30 AM tomorrow.”
The sender of the email would seem to be DNC Research Director Lauren Dillon, who was identified in previous reports of DNC emails released by WikiLeaks in July.
Several hours after the first email was sent, Dillon said in a follow-up email that the interview had been cancelled, “as of now,” but shared a list of questions thought up by the DNC that she said could be used for the next interview.
A separate email from Dillon that same day said “CNN is looking for questions” for then-GOP primary candidate Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, and “maybe a couple on” former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina.
Some of the questions included: “Who helped you write the foreign policy speech you’re giving tomorrow? Which advisors specifically did you talk to? What advice did they give you? Did they give you any advice that you chose not to take?” Others explored Saudi Arabia’s alleged involvement in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a pre-preemptive strike against North Korea and court martials for members of the military who didn’t follow orders.
MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski calls out Democrats for hypocrisy over FBI Director Comey … Scarborough Mocks Pro-Clinton Media, “I Have Been Stunned by the Spinning & Reporting this Weekend”
SOME ON THE LEFT ARE COMING TO REALITY WITH HILLARY CLINTON, HER ACTIONS AND THEIR REPORTING …
“This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don’t really get that. What if there is something big? We’re not going to say it was so outrageous. The bottom line is this all goes back to the server, something she shouldn’t have done, something that was way more than a mistake.
Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski ripped Democrats on Monday for hypocritically attacking FBI Director James Comey in the wake of the re-opened investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server use.
Comey set off a political explosion on Friday after a letter to Congress announcing that emails related to Clinton’s server were found on Anthony Weiner’s computer during a separate investigation into his sexting with an underage girl.
Weiner, a former congressman who resigned in 2011 because of a similar scandal, is the estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
Democrats came down hard on Comey, with Clinton calling his letter “deeply troubling.” Sen. Harry Reid (D., Nev.) accused him of breaking federal law.
Brzezinski, a supporter of Clinton, has nevertheless criticized the Democratic nominee harshly for her use of a private email server and wavering explanations for why she had one.
“This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago,” she said of Comey. “So I don’t really get that. What if there is something big? We’re not going to say it was so outrageous. The bottom line is this all goes back to the server, something she shouldn’t have done, something that was way more than a mistake. Way more.”
Brzezinski called it a “self-inflicted, massive wound.” Noting she has continually ripped Republicans for nominating a figure like Donald Trump, Brzezinski said Democrats had put up someone under FBI investigation.