Sequester for Thee, Not for Me … Bo the Obama Dog Keeps His Motorcade, WH Calligraphers & Never Ending Air Force One Travel, But Children Prevented from Touring White House

Sequester for Thee, Not for Me …

Never has there been a president who cared less about the plight of the American people and acted more like King Louis the XVI’s than President Barack Hussein Obama. It is simple shameless that Barack Obama would inflict pain upon the American people through sequestration to make his childish point and attempt to score political points. Obama is the president who continually talks about shared sacrifice and that every ne must have skin in the game. One would think that he might start with himself and lead by example. That is what a leader would do. However, Obama is no leader. He is a community agitator whose sole job is to keep people at each others throats. Barack Obama is a petty president and it has never been witnessed more just how “small” he is than his threats of the end of times when sequestration took place and his efforts to make sure that “We the People” felt pain, rather than just making cuts that every responsible American has had to do in the past 4 years.

Iowa School children beg Obama to keep tours open. Had it been a Republican President, the MSM would have reported … Obama tells children to pound sand.

As the White House has stated that the tours will end and school children across America who had trips planned are SOL, all in the name of sequester cuts. However, sequestration has not stopped Barack Obama from going about his normal daily life. As government workers are furloughed, Obama tells tourists they can no longer visit the White House, Obama claims long lines will be experienced at airports and he lets illegal aliens loose in the US because of sequestration, one has to wonder what cuts Obama and the first family will feel?  In the past, as reported at the Gateway Pundit via Business, Obama finds the money to take his motorcade with Bo, the first dog, to travel to PetSmart. Does anyone think that Obama will be losing his motorcade? How about less travel time on Air Force One?

The National Parks yearly budget for the White House visitors center is about $9 million or the cost to operate Air Force One for approximately 51 hours. But Obama supposedly cares about the children. BS! And of course the White House has no problem in keeping three calligraphers for a total if $277K a year.

Just curious, if Obama cannot handle 2.3% cuts from government programs without claiming that the sky will fall and such cuts would bring the end of times, how are we supposed to take him serious that he would reform entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid and welfare and programs like Social Security?

UPDATE I:  White House Taking No Actions Yet to Cut Back Its Budget.

While President Barack Obama has spent weeks warning of the dark consequences of across-the-board budget cuts, there’s one area of government where his staff has failed to calculate their impact: the White House itself.

Obama administration spokesman Jay Carney told reporters Thursday that “detailed decisions” have yet to be made about how the administration would meet a projected $24 million reduction to the executive office budget, which may include furloughs of presidential aides and other employees.

“I’m not going say that this person is going have to be furloughed today, if that hasn’t happened yet and we don’t know when that will happen specifically,” he said.

The law requires the executive office of the president, which has about 2,000 employees, to cut approximately $24 million out of its $711 million fiscal year 2013 budget request, according to a report by the White House Office of Management and Budget released the day the reductions came into effect.

DEMOCRAT & MEDIA DOUBLE STANDARD … Oops, Looks like Obama Treasury Secretary Nominee Jack Lew was Sheltering his Money in the Cayman Islands … But It’s Not Romney So That’s OK

Imagine that, only sheltering monies in the Cayman Islands is an issue for Democrats and the MSM when it comes to Republicans and Mitt Romney. Where is that class warfare rhetoric from Obama now?

Don’t look now but President Barack Obama’s Treasury Secretary nominee Jack Lew’s nomination may have hit a bit of a snag. It would appear that he has made investments in the Cayman Island to shelter money. Of course this is not an issue now for the Obama White House, Democrats and the liberal MSM. It was only an issue for former 2012 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Of course it will make no difference to Obama, he is the one who previously had Turbo tax cheat Timothy Geitner of the Treasury Secretary. What’s a little Cayman Island sheltered money?

Republicans have been critical of Lew since his nomination was announced last month. Sens. Jeff Sessions and Orrin Hatch have questioned his role in Medicare policy decisions and his role at Citigroup.

“He’s got to still answer some questions or we may have to postpone the hearing,” Hatch told POLITICO on Thursday. “Right now, I’ve agreed to the hearing date but it is subject to having answers to the questions that were raised. They aren’t difficult to answer, they can answer them.”

Sources said Republicans have not given any indication that they plan to use the information to stall the upcoming hearing or to block the nomination completely.

Committee members will have the chance to question Lew directly at the hearing next week.

“[They] have every right to bring these issues up, that is why we have the committee hearing,” Neary said. “No one is being stopped from asking any questions at these hearings.”

But of course there is no double standard here. Barack Obama was highly critical of GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney for similar investments in funds based in the Cayman Islands, but now has the nerve to nominate an individual who has done the same. How hypocritical could Obama be? Obama obsessed over offshore tax shelters, but nominated someone who has done the very same that Obama claims to be against. What a joke. The Obama White House actually had the nerve to defend Lew and his investment by stating that Lew paid all his taxes on all of his income. As an American Thinker states, the point  is not that Lew disclosed or paid taxes on his income, the issue at hand is the idea that it is evil to have an offshore account – at least it was for Mitt Romney. The specter of an offshore account raise the issue of hidden income and avoidance of taxes. That was the story when Obama slandered Romney, but some hoe it a different story when it comes to Jack Lew.

“President Obama has been almost obsessively critical of offshore investments. He called Ugland House ‘either the biggest building or the biggest tax scam on record,’” Grassley wrote in a statement late Friday.

“For years, we’ve talked about shutting down overseas tax havens that let companies set up operations to avoid paying taxes in America,” Obama said. He said his budget proposal would crack down on businesses which incorporate in places such as Ugland House.

Grassley said of the contrast between Obama’s statements and Lew’s past investment, “The irony is thick.

The Hypocrisy of the LEFT … Government Officials Can Still Own Assault Weapons Under Sen. Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban Bill

MORE LEFTIST HYPOCRISY: ASSAULT STYLE WEAPONS BAN FOR THEE, NOT FOR WE …

We have known for quite some time that the LEFT have considered themselves better than “We the People” and that they live by a different set of rules, even though they tell us to do just the opposite. However, the hypocrisy from the LEFT might have hit an all time high, or low as the case may be. U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (CA-D) has for decades tried to ban assault-style weapons and infringe upon our Second Amendment rights. Her latest bill is just yet another attempt to take guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens. But there is one little provision that seems to have been overlooked. For all of Feinstein’s grandstanding and exploiting the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, for all of her appearances in the MSM calling assault-style guns and the other weapons on her banned list evil, government officials are exempt as weapons used by government officials and law enforcement will not be prohibited by the law!!!

Not everyone is exempted from owning military-style assault weapons under new legislation proposed by U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

Weapons used by government officials and law enforcement will not be prohibited by the law proposed by the California Democrat, which would prohibit the sale, manufacture and importation of 158 specifically named semi-automatic weapons and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Any weapons legally owned before the bill’s enactment would also be exempt, although those firearms would have to be registered in a national database.

In addition, more than 2,200 types of hunting and sporting rifles and manually operated firearms would also be exempt.

Check out all of the weapons under Feinstein’s bill that John Q. Public is not allowed to have, but the privileged class of the government is exempt from and will be able to own.

Since when is the government more important than “We the People”? Since when are the people treated like second rate citizens as compared to the ruling class? This is exactly what Our Founding Fathers set out to prevent when they created the United States of America. UNBELIEVABLE! Just curious, if these weapons are so dangerous, why would government officials be allowed to have them? Could it be because they are a great form of protection against the bad guys? This really is nothing more than a gun grab by the LEFT.

WAKE THE HELL UP AMERICA, MANY INDIVIDUALS HAVE DIED TO PROTECT YOUR LIBERTIES AND FREEDOM. PRETEND LIKE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A CLUE LIKE YOU CARE AND CARE ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY.

New NRA Ad … Barack Obama Is an “Elitist Hypocrite” … Guns to Protect Me, Not for Thee

The NRA website www.nrastandandfight.com released a new ad pointing out the hypocrisy of President Obama on guns. The ad calls President Obama an “elitist hypocrite” for having Secret Service protection of his daughters at school but saying he was “skeptical” about installing armed guards in all schools. What is most interesting is that after Wayne LaPierre stated that all schools should be protected by armed guards as the president’s children are, then why did Obama actually address this. although to a ridiculous amount of 1000 called for during his news conference yesterday.

When asked by NBC’s David Gregory in an interview, President Obama offered his skepticism over NRA’s proposal for putting armed police officers in schools. Even though both of their children’s schools have armed guards. No one is saying that the Obama and Gregory’s children should not be protected by armed guards, we are saying that there need not be a double standard and two sets of rules where our children are not protected. This is the liberal elitist way. Why is it so outrageous to consider protecting school children with guns, it seems to work for those who have their children go to schools with them.

UPDATE I: What must the liberal media be saying after even Obama said that schools need more armed guards? Will they now question his birth certificate and call him crazy like the did the president of the NRA?

Simply Disgusting … Barack Obama Plans to Surround Himself With Children During Gun Control Announcement … What About Teaching the Children, “I’m Just a Bill”?

Mmm, mmm, mmm … Barack Hussein Obama. How shameless and disgusting could President Barack Obama be … now this president is going to use children as props to get his anti-2nd Amendment gun control recommendations passed.

THE DIVIDER IN CHIEF STRIKES AGAIN … White House Press Secretary Jay Carney today announced that President Barack Obama will surround himself with children during his gun control announcement. President Obama is planning to announce 19 executive actions on gun control as he uses children as props.  Not only is this president going to go against the US Constitution, the 2nd Amendment and separation powers in attempting to enact 19 executive gun control orders, but he also plans to act in a shameless manner and exploit children in his liberal agenda power and gun grab. The man is simply without shame.

From the Washington Examiner:

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney announced this afternoon that President Obama will unveil a “concrete package” of gun control proposals including assault weapons bans, high capacity ammunition magazine bans, and closing loopholes on background checks.

Carney said that the president will be joined by Vice President Joe Biden as well as children who wrote to the president after the Newtown shootings.

“They will be joined by children around the country expressing their concerns about gun violence and school safety, along with their parents,” Carney confirmed.

President Obama specifically mentioned children during his December speech in response to the shooting.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney announced this afternoon that President Obama will unveil a “concrete package” of gun control proposals including assault weapons bans, high capacity ammunition magazine bans, and closing loopholes on background checks.

Carney said that the president will be joined by Vice President Joe Biden as well as children who wrote to the president after the Newtown shootings.

“They will be joined by children around the country expressing their concerns about gun violence and school safety, along with their parents,” Carney confirmed.

President Obama specifically mentioned children during his December speech in response to the shooting.

I am sick an tried of this president trying to make it appear that if you are not for what he is for, then you are evil. Frankly, I find it the height of hypocrisy that a present that has inflicted so much debt on the future generations, that would be the children, grand-children and great grandchildren of America, to say he is for saving them.  Maybe following the presser the children  can sing mm, mm, mm … Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Maybe the children behind the president should be in school and be made to watch the below video from School House Rock … I’m just a bill? Instead of being exploited by a president who would seemingly use anyone to get his agenda through without actually following the US Constitution, maybe these kids would be better served to be educated.

What Hypocrisy … Candy Crowley Asks Does it Matter if There is a Lack of Diversity In Obama Cabinet Matter?

Yet another example of media double standard and the demise of the MSM …

Just when you thought there could not be any more hypocrisy from the liberal MSM, they outdo themselves. It is simply amazing just how far they have sold their journalistic integrity when covering Barack Obama. The latest example is their coverage of Obama’s lack of diversity in his Cabinet picks. On CNN’s State of the Union this weekend, host Candy Crowley began a segment on Obama’s lack of diversity in his Cabinet picks by asking her guests, “Does it matter?”

From Newsbusters:

CANDY CROWLEY: There is a lot made about the president’s latest picks in the cabinet. Jack Lew, Senator Hagel, Senator Kerry in key positions here. Treasury, defense, state department. Something that your colleague Congressman Rangel said about the lack of diversity in the cabinet thus far. I’m sorry. Yeah, he said, “It’s embarrassing as hell,” his words. “We’ve been through all of this with [2012 GOP presidential nominee] Mitt Romney. And we were very hard with Mitt Romney with the women binder and a variety of things. And I kind of think there’s no excuse with the second term.” He was talking about where are all these, and there was a White House cabinet picture, a photo that went out and it was kind of astonishing in its white male variety. First of all, does it matter?

What a joke, even Democrat US Rep. Charlie Rangel from New York realizes it is an issue, yet those in the MSM like Candy Crowley who continually carry the water for Obama suddenly have a change of heart when it comes to holding Obama accountable. From Mediaite, Representative Elijah Cummings (D-MD) said that “it does matter” but noted “it’s a little bit early” to judge, because not all the cabinet positions have been filled.   All during the 2012 Presidential election the MSM accused the GOP of a “war on woman” and continually accuse the Republic party as being one of white men. Yet, when Barack Obama does the same with his Cabinet, the media asks whether diversity matters. UNREAL. It is simply shameful that a media would provide Obama a pass when we all know that if and when a Republican is the president and did the same thing, they would be calling for diversity.

For the MSM diversity does matter, as long as Barack Obama is not President. They have sold their journalistic souls to be Obama’s propaganda machine.

Democrat Rep. Charlie Rangel Calls Out Barack Obama on Lack of Diversity … Where Are the Woman that they Criticized Romney For? (VIDEO)

Just another double standard: When a Republican President picks the best candidates, they are racists and sexists … but when Barack Obama does the same, he’s just finding the very best person for the job.

Remember when Barack Obama, Democrats and the complicit liberal MSM accused GOP presidential candidate of having a war on woman and the foolish “binder” comments? It would seem that Obama has his own issues of diversity and a lack of presence of woman in his White House. US Rep Charles Rangel (D-NY) called out Obama and called it “embarrassing as hell” and stated that he could have “a Harvard problem”. OUCH!!! Isn’t that interesting that Rangel just called Obama an elitist.

“it could be the Harvard problem where people just know each other,
trust each other and women and minorities don’t get a chance to rub elbows and their reputations and experience is not known.”

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) on Thursday called it “embarrassing as hell” that President Barack Obama is facing charges that his White House lacks diversity.

“It’s embarrassing as hell. We’ve been through all of this with [2012 GOP presidential nominee] Mitt Romney. And we were very hard with Mitt Romney with the women binder and a variety of things,” Rangel said on MSNBC. “And I kind of think there’s no excuse with the second term.”

The Obama administration has been criticized recently for not having enough diversity with its Cabinet appointees after The New York Times ran a photo of Obama meeting with senior advisers in the Oval Office, the vast majority of them white men. The White House responded by releasing its own photo, which showed a much more diverse crowd of Obama’s top advisers.

“The president values diversity, believes it’s important, because it enhances the quality of the pool of potential nominees for positions across the administration,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said at briefing Tuesday. “He believes that by looking broadly for candidates for offices that [it] ups the chances he’ll find the very best person for the job.

Isn’t this just typical, Obama and his reelection team went after GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and accused the Republican party of a war on women, yet Obama seems to have his own issue with a lack of woman in his White House … but that is perfectly ok and explainable. The hypocrisy is astounding.

Liberal Hypocrisy … NBC’s David Gregory Mocks NRA’s LaPierre for Proposing Armed Guards in Schools, Yet He Sends His Kids to High Security School (Update: Obama’s Daughters Have 11 Armed Guards at Their School)

Once again we are presented with liberal hypocrisy and the double standard. What is good for them, is not the same that “We the People” are allowed.

As reported that The Weekly Standard, me thinks David Gregory dost protest too much. Actually, me thinks David Gregory is two-faced.

Following the tragic mass murders at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT that saw 26 murdered, including 20 children and six adults, NBC’s Davis Gregory went on an anti-Second Amendment gun rant mocking the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for his proposing that armed guards be put in schools for the children’s protection. As LaPierre has stated, “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.” Gregory, the ‘Meet the Press’ host went on to rail that armed guards might not be effective in preventing mass murders at school.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

David Gregory mocked the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for proposing that armed guards be at every school in America. But the NBC host seems to have no problem with armed guards protecting his kids everyday where they attend school in Washington, D.C.

“You proposed armed guards in school. We’ll talk about that in some detail in a moment. You confronted the news media. You blamed Hollywood and the gaming industry. But never once did you concede that guns could actually be part of the problem. Is that a meaningful contribution, Mr. LaPierre, or a dodge?,” asked Gregory.

Later the host suggested that guns don’t prevent violence in schools (he cited the mass shootings at Columbine and Virginia Tech). “But you would concede that, as good as an idea as you think this is, it may not work. Because there have been cases where armed guards have not prevented this kind of massacre, this kind of carnage. I want you would concede that point, wouldn’t you?,” Gregory pleaded.

The NBC host would go on the rest of the segment to suggest that armed guards might not be effective in preventing mass murders at school.

But wait, when it comes to his own children it is a different story.  As it turns out, Gregory not only send his children to a school with armed security guards, he also benefits from the fact that Barack Obama’s children attend the same school and thus Secret Service is present as well. That is correct, the school that Gregory and Obama send their children to has 11 armed security guards for their protection, but some how putting armed guards, police, etc. in other schools s labeled crazy by the Left and the liberal, corrupt media complex.

The Gregory children go to school with the children of President Barack Obama, according to the Washington Post. That school is the co-ed Quaker school Sidwell Friends.

According to a scan of the school’s online faculty-staff directory, Sidwell has a security department made up of at least 11 people. Many of those are police officers, who are presumably armed.

Moreover, with the Obama kids in attendance, there is a secret service presence at the institution, as well.

So why is it perfectly OK for it to have armed security and police in schools of the privileged like David Gregory and Barack Obama, but not that to protect the children of “We the People”? Hmm?

Liberal Comedian Jammie Foxx Thinks its Funny to Joke About Killing Whitey, “I kill all the white people in the room” … How Great and Black is That? (VIDEO)

SHAMEFUL DOUBLE STANDARD … Welcome to Obamaland where reverse racism is deemed perfectly ok. This is the divisive crap that America is going to have to put up with.

Who knew it was funny to joke about killing whitey? It would appear Saturday Night Live, Jammie Foxx and the audience did.  Foxx’s entire monologue was based upon, “How black is that”. Foxx began by saying, “I am dressed in black, because its good to be black. Black is the new white.” He then went on to say the following “kill whitey” comment that drew cheers from the audience. UNREAL. Imagine if a white actor/comedian said it was great to kill blacks people? Just imagine.

 “I got a new movie coming out ‘Django Unchained’. And in the movie I got to wear chains, how whack is that. But don’t be worried about it because in the movie I get out of the chains. I get free. I save my wife and I kill all the white people in the movie. How great is that? And how black is that”?

Some one might need to remind Jammie Foxx, the folks at SNL and those who ignorantly laughed at Foxx’s jokes of some words from a far more famous and influential black person than Jammie Foxx or Barack Obama. Obviously Jammie Foxx has no character.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

 ”I kill all the white people in the room” … How great  is That?

It is truly sad that people of color are making color such a big issue. I thought that liberals wanted there to be no color barrier and all people should be treated the same? So then why do they keep bring the issue of color up? Imagine, just imagine what would be said of a white, Tea Party comedian who’s routine was based upon “how white is that” referenced killing all the black people in the room? They would be branded a racist, a member of the KKK and fired. How sad is it that Democrats continue with the racially divisive speak?  If I did not know better I would almost say they are baiting folks into a race war.  Just curious, had Romney won the 2012 election would it have been ok to say that “white is the new black”?

Newsbusters reminds us that it was just mere weeks ago that Jammie Foxx made another ignorant and outlandish comment when he stated,”President Obama “Our lord and savior.”

Glenn Beck’s Masterpiece of Art … “Obama in Pee Pee” A Constitutional Right of Free Speech

Art is in the eye of the beholder … If the Constitution is good for one person, it should be equally interpreted for Glenn Beck.

Who knew that Glenn Beck was an artist? Well, if you consider the medium is bobble-head dolls and urine, he is your Picasso.  In what can only be described as if its good for the goose, Beck used his US Constitutional rights to create a work of art, Barack Obama in urine or as he named it, “Obama in Pee Pee”. Beck had recently supported artists rights to portray Obama in the image of Jesus Christ, even though it was offensive. The US Constitution protects the rights of others that might offend others and make their blood boil. But of course, the LEFT is all for art that would liken Obama to Jesus, but what will their reaction be to Obama in urine?  I cannot wait for the outrage from the LEFT.

“Art is in the eye of the beholder and this guy has a right to do this. I think its offensive. I don’t think its close to reality but whatever floats your boat. I support his right to do exactly that. I agree with him that people who are upset should not trump his right to be able to do it and be able to hang it wherever he wants – as long as its wanted there,” Glenn said.

And while some may find it surprising that Glenn would support the right for a person to paint a picture of Obama as Christ, he said it all goes to the Constitution – the one irrefutable piece of art which gives people the freedom.

As reported at The Daily Caller, it was really not pee, but beer instead inside the jar. That actually makes Glenn’s artwork and even greater masterpiece as it plays on the juxtapostion and irony of Obama having “beer summits” that are nothing more than photo-ops after he perpetually screws up and proclaims “learning” moments, namely his own.

Let’s see if the LEFT and the MSM have the same opinion of “free speech” when it comes to their Obamamessiah.

UPDATE I: Ebay pulls ‘Obama in Pee Pee’ Art Project Meant to Raise Money for Charity.