What is this? From this page you can use the Social Web links to save Amigo: Lawsuit Kalpoe against Skeeters too expensive to a social bookmarking site, or the E-mail form to send a link via e-mail.

Social Web

E-mail

E-mail It
October 24, 2005

Amigo: Lawsuit Kalpoe against Skeeters too expensive

Posted in: Aruba,Deepak Kalpoe,Missing Persons,Natalee Holloway

From Amigoe, I guess lawyers and clients do not have contingency payment arrangement in Aruba. Deepak’s attorney, Rudi Oomen setting the stage why his client may not be suing Jaime Skeeters for the tapes.

“My client has limited means and cannot just institute a lawsuit in the United States”, said lawyer Rudi Oomen about the rumours that his client Deepak Kalpoe will take legal proceedings against Jamie Skeeters in the States. Skeeters is the man that recorded a conversation with Kalpoe and sold it to Dr. Phil’s TV-show.


Oomen indicated that if there are possibilities to bring charges against Skeeters without it costing too much money, they will definitely consider it. “I’m still looking for those possibilities.” Therefore, on the Internet-sites on the Holloway-case and in the American TV-shows, the tape is being considered as evident of guilt of Joran van der Sloot, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe. According to Oomen, Kalpoe had never said this. “Everybody can hear that tape was put together with cutting and pasting.”

Is there a possibility that there may just not be a lawsuit?

(full story)


Return to: Amigo: Lawsuit Kalpoe against Skeeters too expensive