What is this? From this page you can use the Social Web links to save Was the Steele Dossier the FBI’s ‘Insurance Policy’? to a social bookmarking site, or the E-mail form to send a link via e-mail.

Social Web

E-mail

E-mail It
December 23, 2017

Was the Steele Dossier the FBI’s ‘Insurance Policy’?

Posted in: 2016 Elections,DOJ - Dept of Justice,Donald Trump,FBI,FBI Director James Comey,WTF,You Tube - VIDEO

THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMM …

Remember the text of the meeting when FBI agent Strzok met in McCabe’s office ahead of the 2016 Presidential election and stated that even though there was no way Trump could get elected and a Trump victory was the longest of long shots, the FBI “can’t take that risk” and he insisted that the bureau had no choice but to proceed with a plan to undermine Trump’s candidacy with this insurance policy … “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.” National Review asked the question, was the Steele Dossier the FBI’s insurance policy? As unbelievable as it seems, it appear to be true. The FBI used this ridiculous and discredited document to start the wheels in motion to gain the FISA warrants to undermine a presidency and start a coup.

Individuals don’t just need to be fired, they need to be sent to prison.

The FBI’s deputy director Andrew McCabe testified Tuesday at a marathon seven-hour closed-door hearing of the House Intelligence Committee. According to the now-infamous text message sent by FBI agent Peter Strzok to his paramour, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, it was in McCabe’s office that top FBI counterintelligence officials discussed what they saw as the frightening possibility of a Trump presidency. That was during the stretch run of the 2016 campaign, no more than a couple of weeks after they started receiving the Steele dossier — the Clinton campaign’s opposition-research reports, written by former British spy Christopher Steele, about Trump’s purportedly conspiratorial relationship with Vladimir Putin’s regime in Russia.

Was it the Steele dossier that so frightened the FBI? I think so.

Obama-era FBI and Justice Department had great faith in Steele because he had previously collaborated with the bureau on a big case. Plus, Steele was working on the Trump-Russia project with the wife of a top Obama Justice Department official, who was personally briefed by Steele. The upper ranks of the FBI and DOJ strongly preferred Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, to the point of overlooking significant evidence of her felony misconduct, even as they turned up the heat on Trump. In sum, the FBI and DOJ were predisposed to believe the allegations in Steele’s dossier. Because of their confidence in Steele, because they were predisposed to believe his scandalous claims about Donald Trump, they made grossly inadequate efforts to verify his claims. Contrary to what I hoped would be the case, I’ve come to believe Steele’s claims were used to obtain FISA surveillance authority for an investigation of Trump.

There were layers of insulation between the Clinton campaign and Steele — the campaign and the Democratic party retained a law firm, which contracted with Fusion GPS, which in turn hired the former spy. At some point, though, perhaps early on, the FBI and DOJ learned that the dossier was actually a partisan opposition-research product. By then, they were dug in. No one, after all, would be any the wiser: Hillary would coast to victory, so Democrats would continue running the government; FISA materials are highly classified, so they’d be kept under wraps. Just as it had been with the Obama-era’s Fast and Furious and IRS scandals, any malfeasance would remain hidden.


Return to: Was the Steele Dossier the FBI’s ‘Insurance Policy’?