Al Gore’s Inconvenient or is it an Inconsistent Truth … His Lies About Global Warming … North Pole is Melting

Why does any one listen or take Al Gore serious?

In the end, Al Gore’s tale about global warming really is an Inconvenient Truth, his own. What, you mean every one did not realize Gore was just making this stuff up as he went along and no one dared actually challenge what the Goricle was saying?

The only hot air is coming from Gore and Climategate

What, Al Gore get caught with a factual fabrication? Say it isn’t so. The real story is that some one actually called him on it. This is the face of global warming … the court jester, Al Gore. I guess the center of the earth is a million degrees too, isn’t it Al?

There are many kinds of truth. Al Gore was poleaxed by an inconvenient one yesterday.

The former US Vice-President, who became an unlikely figurehead for the green movement after narrating the Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth, became entangled in a new climate change “spin” row.

Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.

In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”

However, the climatologist whose work Mr Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast.

“It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”

Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore.

The embarrassing error cast another shadow over the conference after the controversy over the hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, which appeared to suggest that scientists had manipulated data to strengthen their argument that human activities were causing global warming.

Oh, but as the humiliated global warming crowd will tell you, this is settled science.