Juror B29 Says that George Zimmerman “Got Away with Murder” in the Death of Trayvon Martin


Hmm, if juror B29 initially voted to convict George Zimmerman guilty of second degree murder, how did she suddenly come to a not guilty verdict?

In an exclusive ABC News interview on ‘Good Morning America (VIDEO),’ juror  B29, Maddy, spoke out regarding being on the jury in the George Zimmerman murder trial. Juror B29 said that George Zimmerman “got away with murder,” but then said, “but you can’t get away from God. As reported at the Orlando Sentinel, juror B29 was the lone minority juror and said that she initially voted to convict Zimmerman of second-degree murder because “the evidence shows he’s guilty.” However, after 16 hours of deliberation, she  joined the five other women on the jury and acquitted Zimmerman in the murder and manslaughter of 17-year old Trayvon Martin.


The only minority on the all-female jury that voted to acquit George Zimmerman said today that Zimmerman “got away with murder” for killing Trayvon Martin and feels she owes an apology Martin’s parents.

“You can’t put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty,” said the woman who was identified only as Juror B29 during the trial. “But we had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence.”

She said the jury was following Florida law and the evidence, she said, did not prove murder.

The court had sealed the jurors’ identities during the trial and still hasn’t lifted the order, but Juror B29 edged out of the shadows in an exclusive interview with “Good Morning America” anchor Robin Roberts. She allowed her face to be shown, but — concerned for her safety — used only a first name of Maddy.

Her comments are rather telling. According to juror B29, they looked for every thing and anything to find George Zimmerman guilty of something. After 26 hours of deliberation, the jury could come up with nothing. The evidence was not there to support murder or manslaughter. I would ask the following question, isn’t that how the law is intended to work? Juror B29 told ABC that she and others on the panel felt Zimmerman was guilty, but that wasn’t enough evidence. HUH? So emotionally she felt that Zimmerman was guilty, but factually he was not. Doesn’t this speak volumes to the case that the prosecutors put on during the George Zimmerman murder trial?  They had no facts, they had no evidence and the judge did not allow the past of Trayvon Martin into evidence or the texts from his cell phone discussing fighting.

A note to juror B29, did it ever dawn on you that some one did not commit murder if the prosecution could provide no evidence that there was a murder?

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Judge Debra S. Nelson Sets Date of June 10, 2013 for Start of George Zimmerman Murder Case in Death of Trayvon Martin
  • George Zimmerman Punched in Face for Allegedly Bragging about Killing Trayvon Martin
  • Trayvon Martin Murder Case: George Zimmerman Released from Jail on $1 Million Bond in Trayvon Martin Shooting
  • Things That Make You Go Hmmm … George Zimmerman Passed Police Lie Detector Test Day After Death of Trayvon Martin
  • Former Trayvon Martin’s Medical Examiner Dr. Shiping Bao Says Prosecution Threw the George Zimmerman Murder Case

  • Comments

    10 Responses to “Juror B29 Says that George Zimmerman “Got Away with Murder” in the Death of Trayvon Martin”

    1. Tamikosmom on July 26th, 2013 8:11 am

      A note to juror B29, did it ever dawn on you that some one did not commit murder if the prosecution could provide no evidence that there was a murder?

      Posted July 26, 2013 by Scared Monkeys



    2. dawg1948 on July 26th, 2013 10:21 am

      This woman is so over the top. She agrees the man is not guilty according to the evidence submitted and the arguments made and then says he got away with murder based on the jury’s decision of which she was a part. Makes no sense to me. The fact is if she was convinced of Mr. Zimmerman’s guilt and went along with a not guilty verdict she is complicit in the murder of Travon. Her proper recourse was to refuse to budge from a guilty plea and force a hung jury in which case another trial would have been in order and Mr. Zimmerman may have been convicted. In short, the findings of the jury are binding and she should now shut her DAMN MOUTH. All these Jackasses, such as Joe Scarborough need to shut the hell up. In the eyes of the law Mr. Zimmerman is innocent and should be allowed to go on with is damaged life without their garbage. By the way I specifically mention Joe because I have heard why he got out of Congress and it wasn’t because of his two boys. I don’t watch Joe because he is the biggest farce ever and is nothing but a 1st degree Rino. Suffice it to say people that are passing a post trial personal verdict on Mr. Zimmerman need to clean up around their own back doors first.

    3. mc on July 26th, 2013 1:35 pm

      For what it’s worth here’s proof that the jurors were NOT all white.

    4. kashekamon on July 26th, 2013 1:44 pm

      I think Juror 29 sees $$$ signs by giving the interviews. Not George Zimmermans fault that she’s got 8 kids to support. George’s attorneys should sue her too for saying that he committed murder and having it broadcasted all over TV and the media.

    5. kashekamon on July 26th, 2013 4:42 pm

      Hey woman, whats you talkin’ bout!!!!

    6. kashekamon on July 26th, 2013 4:51 pm

      As Martin Luther King stated:

      “We can’t keep on blaming the white man.
      There are things we must do for ourselves.
      We’ve got to do something about our moral

    7. A Texas Grandfather on July 26th, 2013 7:31 pm

      This is the scarey part about jurors. While she did not understand the difference between self defense and choosing to attack, the other jurors apparently were able to convince her that the state did not prove their case. It is hard for some to overcome their belief regarding using a gun to protect one’s self is murder.

      This entire case was an attempt by the race baiter’s and the state of Florida to commit a lynching of George Zimmerman.

      This case should be used in the future to instruct law classes in how a group of zealots acting under color of the law can create a legal mess and how easy it is to trap attorney’s and the criminal justice system to do so.

    8. kashekamon on July 26th, 2013 9:10 pm

      I don’t believe juror 29 is that damn dumb. Apparently she really didn’t have any issues or she could of addressed them to the judge. She’s a fake and a phony. This is a piece of work. Collecting money on a case that’s already been solved through paid interviews, lying through her teeth and wanting sympathy for finding George not guilty for the death of Trayvon that he caused himself. She is BS.

    9. A Texas Grandfather on July 27th, 2013 8:37 am

      It has been reported that the video of the interview has been selectively edited to make it appear that this juror said things in a manner she did not. Can’t trust the media to report the truth.

    10. Tamikosmom on July 27th, 2013 8:53 am


      Did George Zimmerman Get Away With Murder?
      The media are reporting that a juror says Zimmerman is guilty of murder. That’s not true.
      Friday, July 26, 2013

      ABC News hasn’t posted a full unedited video or transcript of the interview. The video that has been broadcast—on World News Tonight, Nightline, and Good Morning America—has been cut and spliced in different ways, often so artfully that the transitions appear continuous. So beware what you’re seeing. But the video that’s available already shows, on closer inspection, that Maddy has been manipulated and misrepresented. Here are the key points. …..

      Read more:

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It