Romney Says … “VOTE FOR LOVE OF COUNTRY” … not Obama’s Revenge


Hey America, how’s that Obama “Hopey-Changey” thing working out for you?

One again we see the stark difference between the two presidential candidates. Obama, negative, vindictive and mean spirited. Romney, acting presidential and spouting the ideals of America.

The other day Barack Obama told his supporters in an ugly and small minded off-teleprompter comment, Obama stated ... “vote for revenge”.  This reeks of a “community agitator” not a president. The remarks of a small, bitter little, closed minded man. Who believes that such a man is willing to work with any one who does not agree with him?

However, Republican Presidential nominee stated to his supporters that you should, “VOTE FOR LOVE OF COUNTRY”.

Did you see what President Obama said today? He asked his supporters to vote for “revenge.” For “revenge.” Instead, I ask the American people to vote for love of country

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Barack Obama Tells Supports in Ohio, “Voting is the best Revenge” … Revenge? How Ugly and Small Minded Could This President Really Be?
  • Romney Takes Lead in Final Rasmussen Poll …Also Leads in Final Gallup Poll As Well
  • Rasmussen: Mitt Romney 49% – Barack Obama 44%, The Obamamessiah Cannot Get over 50%
  • Mitt Romney Tells Far Left Heckler Who Wants Free Birth Control Where to Go …: “If You’re Looking For Free Stuff, Vote Obama
  • The DNC Convention Bounce is Over, Rasmussen Has Romney Up by 1% over Obama … 50% Believe Romney Better for Economy

  • Comments

    6 Responses to “Romney Says … “VOTE FOR LOVE OF COUNTRY” … not Obama’s Revenge”

    1. Tamikosmom on November 4th, 2012 11:53 am

      Many Americans sincerely do not get it. Hey … many Canadians sincerely do not get it.

      Maybe if the future implication encompassing a Barack Obama’s victory had been CLEARLY exposed from the the Republican platform throughout the campaign … the polls at this late date would not reveal that the outcome of the 2012 Presidential election is too close to predict.

      Alexander Fraser Tyler – ‘The Decline and Fall of the Athenian Republic’ 1887

      “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the Public Treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy always followed by dictatorship.

      The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been two-hundred years. These nations have progressed throught this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to abundance; from abundance to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependence back again into bondage.”

    2. Tamikosmom on November 4th, 2012 12:00 pm

      Thomas Peterffy gets it!!

      Hungarian-born billionaire makes anti-socialism case in TV ad
      Published October 12, 2012

      Peterffy recalls his childhood under socialism in Hungary, and says, “The nation became poorer and poorer. And that’s what I see happening here.” He warns that the United States, his adopted country, is embarking on a “slippery slope.”

      He continues: “America’s wealth comes from the efforts of people striving for success. Take away their incentive with badmouthing success and you take away the wealth that helps us take care of the needy. Yes, in socialism the rich will be poorer — but the poor will also be poorer. People will lose interest in really working hard and creating jobs.”

      Read more:

      Thomas Peterffy – Freedom To Succeed

    3. leader on November 4th, 2012 12:46 pm

      moderate mittens……he is the guy
      what happened to severe conservative mittens?
      SM: No the question is what ever happened to the positive Obama? Sorry, your boy just showed what a reprehensible, vile, small president he truly is.

      I can only imagine what a second term of this reprobate would be like.

    4. dennisintn on November 4th, 2012 2:35 pm

      obama is the same as candidate obama. he lied his way into the presidency with the complicity of msm, just as he’s lied his way through the last 4 years, and now he’s trying to lie his way into a second and last term during which we’ll all find out just bad he really is.

    5. on November 4th, 2012 7:19 pm

      leader on November 4th, 2012 12:46 pm

      Moderate Owe?
      Liberal Owe?
      Marxist Owe – what happened to moderate and liberal Owe?

      Mitt is merely making the case that he CAN and WILL work with both parties. Watch him do it in 2013!

    6. Rwolf on November 5th, 2012 1:47 am

      Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest American Militias?

      Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?

      Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

      Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

      The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

      During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

      NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

      You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

      Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

      Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It