More From the Obama Backed Occupy Protesters, OccupyDayton Protester Say “F*ck The Military, F*ck Your Flag, And F*ck The Police” … Only Supported by 37%


Remember, the Occupy protesters are supported by President Barack Obama and Democrats …

Take a good look and listen to what Barack Obama is supporting. An individual at Occupy Dayton shows their true colors with the following diatribe, “F*ck The Military, F*ck Your Flag, And F*ck The Police”. Watch the VIDEO at Breitbart TV (warning, adult language).  Why is Obama not condemning the protesters, he is the Commander in Chief, is he not?  “F” the police, I thought Obama and Biden have been shilling for more police jobs or more rapes will occur?  Could you imagine of any one at a Tea Party rally popped off like this? It would be the lead story across America in the MSM.

Click on pic for VIDEO (Warning, explicit, adult language)

A citizen journalist was taking pictures of the destruction the “Occupy Dayton” protest caused to public property when he was approached by a group of demonstrators. A protester became very hostile, attacked a veteran for his service, and said that he was proud of his (white) race.

As per an update from Big Government, the “Media Committee” of Occupy Dayton issued the press release below, in which organizers threaten to sue… someone… for libel. Libel, for publishing one’s own words? Really?

The case that Occupy Dayton relies on, Becker v. Toulmin, 165 Ohio St. 549 (1956), does not have any relevance here. The video merely publishes the activist’s own words, which he stated volubly and in public.

Furthermore, the activist depicted is involved in a matter of public concern, and therefore is a public figure for the purpose of Occupy Dayton. He would therefore have to meet a higher–in this case, impossible–standard of proof.

Neither he, nor Occupy Dayton, has a case.

Is it any wonder that only 37% of Americans support the “OCCUPY” protesters? The above actions, let alone the arrests, words, crimes and plethora of “hate America” rhetoric have made may in the US take a good look at the Occupy protesters and realize, they are not worth supporting. So why does Obama support them while continue to pander to Wall Street companies for campaign donations?

Some 37 percent of people back the protests that have spread from New York to cities across the country and abroad, one of the first snapshots of how the public views the “Occupy Wall Street’’ movement. A majority of those protest supporters are Democrats, but the anger about politics in general is much more widespread, the poll indicates.

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Obama Supported Occupy Cleveland Protester Claims She Was Raped … Yeah, Just Like the Tea Party
  • Obama Endorsed OWS … Four Occupy Charlotte Protesters, Including the spokesman Charged For Setting Fire to Two American Flags
  • An #OWS Protest Too Far … Even Bill Maher Turns Against Them, Calls Them D-bags & They Should ‘Get a Job’
  • FBI Warns of Anti-Government Extremists Opposed to Taxes & Regulations Pose a Growing Threat to Local Law Enforcement in United States
  • Obama, Democrats and MSM Say TEA PARTY Just like OCCUPY WALL STREET Protesters … Really, You Make the Call

  • Comments

    13 Responses to “More From the Obama Backed Occupy Protesters, OccupyDayton Protester Say “F*ck The Military, F*ck Your Flag, And F*ck The Police” … Only Supported by 37%”

    1. flutter1 on October 24th, 2011 11:19 am

      “…f*ck your flag…”

      Yes, thank you scumball for recognizing that it is not your flag but my flag. Now get the f*ck out of my country and quit wasting my countries resources.

    2. Dawg1948 on October 24th, 2011 1:23 pm

      The scary part of only 37% of the American public support these clowns is thay say only 29% support the Tea Party. I think their numbers are way off there are many more of us that support the Tea Party movement than there are those that donate to them and participate openly. In other words Tea Party supporters are more like a silent majority and the real support is higher than 29% am willing to bet. As for the Occupy people their uproar over the banks getting bail outs the Tea Partiers also agree with. Its things like a minimum wage of $20/Hr. whether you work or not that loses real sympathy and support real quick.

    3. flippy on October 24th, 2011 2:01 pm

      Thing is, the “occupy” protesters are “occupying”. The Tea Party protests stayed for a few hours and went home (or on the bus to the next rally)

      Those that can sit around in a park for weeks on end are a particular demographic. In that group there will be plenty of articulate people with a good grasp on reality…..but also a lot who do not. Since the “occupy” people don’t have any real leaders or coherent message……well that just makes it all the messier and confounding to the rest of us.

      Though I don’t like/support the Tea Party candidates, I knew what it was that I was disagreeing with (the social issues, for the record).

    4. flippy on October 24th, 2011 2:08 pm

      Just a side note though…why do you say “only 37%”, that is actually an astoundingly high number…..I would have guessed half that.

      At the height of Tea Party support, weren’t they in the 30-ish percentages as well?

    5. A Texas Grandfather on October 24th, 2011 2:42 pm

      If one reads the article reference for the poll it will be found that 64 of the 100 were Democrats, 22 Independents and 14 Republicans.

      Not a very balanced poll with 2.91 Democrats for each Independent and 4.57 Democrats for every Republican.

      The real poll number,if it were balanced,is likely to be not the 37% reported, but in the 15 to 20 per cent range.

      Polls like this one are manipulated to match a predetermined outcome. However,even with the obvious manipulation it came out as few in the population support the WWS idea.

    6. Elmer on October 24th, 2011 7:04 pm

      So… We have an article decrying the use of the “F-word” filed under the category of “What the F___.” I have very little respect for anyone who uses the f-word in any form or capacity in public discourse. That includes cutesy little acronyms.
      SM: huh? So how would we be able to do the quote?

    7. NGBoston on October 24th, 2011 7:26 pm

      #1-Applause! Standing O!

      Couldn’t have said it better myself, so you did the job quite adequately.

      LOVE YOUR POST! Thanks for that.

    8. rightknight on October 24th, 2011 11:36 pm

      Civilized Peoples feel very bad when they toss
      the pearls of Freedom before this herd of smelly
      swine. The vapid, hate filled eyes of this misfit
      reflect the cross section of the latest group of
      ‘occupiers’ of the city. The normally rosy business
      district has a sickly growth on it at this time.

    9. super dave on October 25th, 2011 5:46 am

      like a majority of today’s generation x, most of these losers aren’t even aware of the reason for what they protest about. and it seems that the democrats support rape, molesting underage children, and murder as joe biden so hoped for.

    10. super dave on October 25th, 2011 3:12 pm

      so, Obama’s friends molested and raped a 14 year old girl in Dallas. typical democrat behaviour.

    11. Dolf on October 25th, 2011 3:13 pm

      Here in NL & UK the occupy movement is going down hill fast.

    12. flutter1 on October 26th, 2011 7:09 am

      #7 – Thank you; I have admired many of your comments here as well.

    13. Extreme on October 26th, 2011 8:33 pm

      The number that supports ows is as low as their morals and limited to the media, unios and demoncrats. I for one love that they are showing America that they exist and that the pretender in the white house has something else blow up in his face.

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It