<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS Backs Ban on Partial Birth Abortion, &#8220;Promote Respect for life, Including the life of the Unborn.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/</link>
	<description>News, Information and Missing Persons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyo muffintop</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-559813</link>
		<dc:creator>yoyo muffintop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-559813</guid>
		<description>You make a great point R-squared.  You get jumped because you interject GW and the war into topics that have nothing to do with it, but the same is not done when people inject Aruba into topics that have nothing to do with Aruba.
Wonder why that is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a great point R-squared.  You get jumped because you interject GW and the war into topics that have nothing to do with it, but the same is not done when people inject Aruba into topics that have nothing to do with Aruba.<br />
Wonder why that is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R-squared</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-559103</link>
		<dc:creator>R-squared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-559103</guid>
		<description>#3.  I find your comment amusing to say the least.  To be called a liberal or on the left just makes me laugh.  I am as conservative as they come.

You are right that I twisted PBA into a GWB bashing and that was probably less than appropriate.

It&#039;s simply a metter that GWB and his sidekick make me want to puke.  We are in Iraq killing beautiful young Americans based on lies and more lies.

And speaking of tired messages.  How about your coverage of what&#039;s happening in Aruba.  I am a 100% supporter of the boycott and a 100% believer that the government and law enforcement in Aruba completely screwed the Holloway family to cover up a crime by one of their &quot;protected people.&quot;

But you guys continue to bash and bash everyting that happens in Aruba.  Anything from a small oil spill to an attempt to redecorate the airport.  Aruba screwed up big time with the NH case but you guys jump on everything that they do.

I jump on GWB because he is a disgrace in world leadership.  He has lied to the world repeatedly.  He has made America and Americans the most hated images in the world. He has caused hundreds of thousands to be killed, maimed, or displaced from their homes.  He is building up a debt that will destroy our grandchildren.  He is mentally ill and stupid and has that miserable p***k Cheney whispering in his ear and is too stupid to separate facts from fiction.



GWB, aside from being stupid, hides behind his so-called christianity which is a joke.  He is against embryonic stem cell research and abortion because of his &quot;christian&quot; regard for life, yet he sacrifices thousands to support his stupid mistake of entering into a war with Iraq in the first place.  Now the moron is looking to duke it out with Iran, all to support AIPAC influenced ideas.

Thanks to GWB, America is the most hated country in the workd and Americans are the most hated people.  Read what&#039;s going on and get grounded in reality.

So I bash Bush because he is contributing to the destruction of America.  You guys bash Aruba because they contributed to the cover-up of one missing person.

I don&#039;t know who has the tired message, but I think it&#039;s SM and not RR.

Thanks for taking the time to read this.  I am in no way a liberal, just a senior citizen that has watched America go to hell under the guidance of people like GWB and his pack of lying yes men/women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3.  I find your comment amusing to say the least.  To be called a liberal or on the left just makes me laugh.  I am as conservative as they come.</p>
<p>You are right that I twisted PBA into a GWB bashing and that was probably less than appropriate.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simply a metter that GWB and his sidekick make me want to puke.  We are in Iraq killing beautiful young Americans based on lies and more lies.</p>
<p>And speaking of tired messages.  How about your coverage of what&#8217;s happening in Aruba.  I am a 100% supporter of the boycott and a 100% believer that the government and law enforcement in Aruba completely screwed the Holloway family to cover up a crime by one of their &#8220;protected people.&#8221;</p>
<p>But you guys continue to bash and bash everyting that happens in Aruba.  Anything from a small oil spill to an attempt to redecorate the airport.  Aruba screwed up big time with the NH case but you guys jump on everything that they do.</p>
<p>I jump on GWB because he is a disgrace in world leadership.  He has lied to the world repeatedly.  He has made America and Americans the most hated images in the world. He has caused hundreds of thousands to be killed, maimed, or displaced from their homes.  He is building up a debt that will destroy our grandchildren.  He is mentally ill and stupid and has that miserable p***k Cheney whispering in his ear and is too stupid to separate facts from fiction.</p>
<p>GWB, aside from being stupid, hides behind his so-called christianity which is a joke.  He is against embryonic stem cell research and abortion because of his &#8220;christian&#8221; regard for life, yet he sacrifices thousands to support his stupid mistake of entering into a war with Iraq in the first place.  Now the moron is looking to duke it out with Iran, all to support AIPAC influenced ideas.</p>
<p>Thanks to GWB, America is the most hated country in the workd and Americans are the most hated people.  Read what&#8217;s going on and get grounded in reality.</p>
<p>So I bash Bush because he is contributing to the destruction of America.  You guys bash Aruba because they contributed to the cover-up of one missing person.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know who has the tired message, but I think it&#8217;s SM and not RR.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to read this.  I am in no way a liberal, just a senior citizen that has watched America go to hell under the guidance of people like GWB and his pack of lying yes men/women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irl500girl</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558640</link>
		<dc:creator>irl500girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558640</guid>
		<description>PBA is so disgusting.  It&#039;s murdering children!  Why a woman would have abortion in the first place (unless rape, incest, health issues) is sick enuf&#039; but to wait that long for an abortion is simply beyond my understanding.  I get so sick of these women who use abortion as birth control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PBA is so disgusting.  It&#8217;s murdering children!  Why a woman would have abortion in the first place (unless rape, incest, health issues) is sick enuf&#8217; but to wait that long for an abortion is simply beyond my understanding.  I get so sick of these women who use abortion as birth control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robots</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558620</link>
		<dc:creator>robots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558620</guid>
		<description>thank goodness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank goodness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wreck</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558569</link>
		<dc:creator>wreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558569</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t have said it ant better, SM!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t have said it ant better, SM!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss-Underestimated</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558548</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss-Underestimated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558548</guid>
		<description>With the birth control available, with the exception of rape and resulting harm to mothers health, if women take advantage of all perscription options, abortion would be all but eleminated with the two exceptions.  

Abortion has become the birth control for many.  Abortion in itself has more dangers that child birth or birth control.  We need to educate women that an abortion is not a form of birth control.

This lack of education has been EVERY presidents short coming.  I would think N.O.W. would work with women health groups to educate women.  Birth Control should be the education.   

There is an old saying.  Be careful what you ask for. If your screaming about womens reproductive rights, you may want to expand your political view, the presidential candidates now, will put aside abortion controversy for more control of your rights, bigger and more far reaching.  
Like a game,  give em abortions, but when their looking there let&#039;s strip away.......say......?
Abortion has become a political shell in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the birth control available, with the exception of rape and resulting harm to mothers health, if women take advantage of all perscription options, abortion would be all but eleminated with the two exceptions.  </p>
<p>Abortion has become the birth control for many.  Abortion in itself has more dangers that child birth or birth control.  We need to educate women that an abortion is not a form of birth control.</p>
<p>This lack of education has been EVERY presidents short coming.  I would think N.O.W. would work with women health groups to educate women.  Birth Control should be the education.   </p>
<p>There is an old saying.  Be careful what you ask for. If your screaming about womens reproductive rights, you may want to expand your political view, the presidential candidates now, will put aside abortion controversy for more control of your rights, bigger and more far reaching.<br />
Like a game,  give em abortions, but when their looking there let&#8217;s strip away&#8230;&#8230;.say&#8230;&#8230;?<br />
Abortion has become a political shell in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scared Monkeys</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558537</link>
		<dc:creator>Scared Monkeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558537</guid>
		<description>#1. Why must everything the Left does be based upon their hate for GWB? Its actually really old.

What will you poor people do when another Republican is President and Bush is not to blame for everything including cancer?

Exactly how much hate do you all have that is so consuming?

You take a heinous issue like PBA that you all know is wrong and somehow manage to still find a way to take a swipe at GW. What a tired message.
R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1. Why must everything the Left does be based upon their hate for GWB? Its actually really old.</p>
<p>What will you poor people do when another Republican is President and Bush is not to blame for everything including cancer?</p>
<p>Exactly how much hate do you all have that is so consuming?</p>
<p>You take a heinous issue like PBA that you all know is wrong and somehow manage to still find a way to take a swipe at GW. What a tired message.<br />
R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyo muffintop</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558405</link>
		<dc:creator>yoyo muffintop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558405</guid>
		<description>Ahh - politics vs science.  It would be nice if one day science won.

Here&#039;s the response from the ACOG:
Washington, DC -- Despite the fact that the safety advantages of intact dilatation and evacuation (intact D&amp;E) procedures are widely recognized-in medical texts, peer-reviewed studies, clinical practice, and in mainstream, medical care in the United States-the US Supreme Court today upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. 

According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists&#039; (ACOG) amicus brief opposing the Ban, the Act will chill doctors from providing a wide range of procedures used to perform induced abortions or to treat cases of miscarriage and will gravely endanger the health of women in this country. 

&quot;Today&#039;s decision to uphold the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 is shameful and incomprehensible to those of us who have dedicated our lives to caring for women,&quot; said Douglas W. Laube, MD, MEd, ACOG president. &quot;It leaves no doubt that women&#039;s health in America is perceived as being of little consequence. 

&quot;We have seen a steady erosion of women&#039;s reproductive rights in this country. The Supreme Court&#039;s action today, though stunning, in many ways isn&#039;t surprising given the current culture in which scientific knowledge frequently takes a back seat to subjective opinion,&quot; he added. 

This decision discounts and disregards the medical consensus that intact D&amp;E is safest and offers significant benefits for women suffering from certain conditions that make the potential complications of non-intact D&amp;E especially dangerous. Moreover, it diminishes the doctor-patient relationship by preventing physicians from using their clinical experience and judgment. 

&quot;On behalf of the 51,000 ACOG members who strive to provide the very best possible medical care to the women we serve, I can only hope that in the future, science will again be at the core of decision-making that affects the life and well-being of all of us,&quot; said Dr. Laube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh &#8211; politics vs science.  It would be nice if one day science won.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the response from the ACOG:<br />
Washington, DC &#8212; Despite the fact that the safety advantages of intact dilatation and evacuation (intact D&amp;E) procedures are widely recognized-in medical texts, peer-reviewed studies, clinical practice, and in mainstream, medical care in the United States-the US Supreme Court today upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. </p>
<p>According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists&#8217; (ACOG) amicus brief opposing the Ban, the Act will chill doctors from providing a wide range of procedures used to perform induced abortions or to treat cases of miscarriage and will gravely endanger the health of women in this country. </p>
<p>&#8220;Today&#8217;s decision to uphold the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 is shameful and incomprehensible to those of us who have dedicated our lives to caring for women,&#8221; said Douglas W. Laube, MD, MEd, ACOG president. &#8220;It leaves no doubt that women&#8217;s health in America is perceived as being of little consequence. </p>
<p>&#8220;We have seen a steady erosion of women&#8217;s reproductive rights in this country. The Supreme Court&#8217;s action today, though stunning, in many ways isn&#8217;t surprising given the current culture in which scientific knowledge frequently takes a back seat to subjective opinion,&#8221; he added. </p>
<p>This decision discounts and disregards the medical consensus that intact D&amp;E is safest and offers significant benefits for women suffering from certain conditions that make the potential complications of non-intact D&amp;E especially dangerous. Moreover, it diminishes the doctor-patient relationship by preventing physicians from using their clinical experience and judgment. </p>
<p>&#8220;On behalf of the 51,000 ACOG members who strive to provide the very best possible medical care to the women we serve, I can only hope that in the future, science will again be at the core of decision-making that affects the life and well-being of all of us,&#8221; said Dr. Laube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R-squared</title>
		<link>http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-558396</link>
		<dc:creator>R-squared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/18/scotus-backs-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-558396</guid>
		<description>From what I have read about partial birth abortions, the decision is the right one, but here we are with an interesting situation.

You&#039;re safe while you are in the womb, but once you&#039;re on the outside, watch out.  G W bush is waiting to send you to Iraq to be killed in his war against terrorism better known as his support of our so called ralationship with Israel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have read about partial birth abortions, the decision is the right one, but here we are with an interesting situation.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re safe while you are in the womb, but once you&#8217;re on the outside, watch out.  G W bush is waiting to send you to Iraq to be killed in his war against terrorism better known as his support of our so called ralationship with Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

