Scared Monkeys Video Satish Kalpoe Lies As Well … Innocent People Do not Lie


Satish Kalpoe, why are you lying as well? Is Satish Kalpoe an innocent bystander or more involved in Natalee’s disappearance than anyone suspected? Are you protecting others, or yourself?

Some of the many statements from Sataish Kalpoe

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Diario: Satish Kalpoe and his lawyer Invited to comment on Deepak recording
  • Joran Van der Sloot, Deepak & Satish Kalpoe: Webs of Deception
  • Dr. Phil Attorneys Use Scared Monkeys Natalee Holloway Posts as Exhibit in Court Docs Against Deepak & Satish Kalpoes
  • Aruban Update: Status on the Release of Suspects
  • Natalee Holloway: Estate of Jamie Skeeters Wins Motion to Strike Against Kalpoes in Dr. Phil Defamation Case

  • Comments

    25 Responses to “Scared Monkeys Video Satish Kalpoe Lies As Well … Innocent People Do not Lie”

    1. Leslie on March 1st, 2007 3:59 pm

      Excellent work. He lies so easily and in such minute detail and then retracts the entire story that you shouldn’t believe one word that comes out of his mouth, ever.

    2. Patti on March 1st, 2007 4:33 pm

      Yeah, he lied, but he did have a conscience about it… unwilling to swear by his statement without it being reviewed by his attorney. Too bad that his attorney was bought and paid for by Paulus.

      Of the two brothers, Satish is the one with enough sense not to trust Joran and Paulus. Maybe he realized that good people don’t lie, and was wondering what really happened to Natalee that Paulus and Joran would ask them to lie for them.

      The last statement, regarding no corpse, is the most telling. It sure sounds like Joran and his dad, both, were threatening their witnesses. Joran with his statement to Deepak and Satish that he should have killed them when he had the chance (probably, by the pool) and Paulus threatening that there could be trace evidence left behind that could tie the Kalpoes to the crime.

      Isn’t that obstruction in and of itself?

      I suppose that if you lived in Aruba as an alien from Suriname, Paulus would be considered a “Big” person. Maybe one that would lie and bully you into lying with him… or perhaps, one that you might look to for protection if you thought that you were one of the last people seen with a girl that went missing.

      Isn’t the Marriott close (real close) in proximity to Mc Donalds?

      I believe Satish when he says that they dropped Natalee and Joran off at the Marriott. I also believe that Joran was picked up at Mc Donalds at 4am, by his dad, problem is… where’s Natalee?

    3. Dutch Guy on March 1st, 2007 4:42 pm

      Cool video…!!

    4. cara scott on March 1st, 2007 4:51 pm

      Sounds like more lies to me! Think It is terrible after all this time we are no nearer to the truth; Quick question&sorry If this has been asked but do any door key records exist for the holiday Inn hotel? Thought it may show a time line?

    5. SL-Gloria on March 1st, 2007 5:28 pm

      The Kalpoe lawyer that was retained by Paulus was Ruud Oomens…he was Deepak’s lawyer. Cohen said two of the men had sex with Natalee. Deepak was receiving the text messages somewhat passed 2 AM, probably because he was the one home, not the other way around.

      Paulus was released from jail because several witnesses-one of them allegedly Greta-testified that Paulus had stated he picked up Joran from McDonald’s at 11 PM, not 4 AM as Mrs. Holloway-Twitty claimed.

      If you check the following transcript, Greta clearly tries to correct Mrs. Holloway-Twitty, with regards to Paulus’ statement when they (Beth, Greta) visited the van der Sloot home. Greta infers that Paulus specified 11 PM, not 4 AM:

      “BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: I think I just saw specific little details that just have started eating me alive just, I mean, from details of that first night, when we met Joran and Paul and Deepak, you know, just little details that have been eating away at me on this pick-up time at McDonald’s, you know, Paul van der Sloot stated specifically and emphatically he picked them up at 4 a.m. I have it documented in my journal too many times to know that…

      VAN SUSTEREN: At 11 p.m.?

      BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: No, he told us 4 a.m.

      GEORGE “JUG” TWITTY: To start with.

      BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: To start with. And then, you know, I noticed when you and I went to his home, do you know that was the first time that he had ever changed it to 11 p.m.?

      VAN SUSTEREN: But before then, it had been 4 a.m., but then with us, it’s 11 p.m.”

      (,2933,164506,00.html )

      Subsequently, Mrs. Holloway-Twitty tries to rebut Greta, by saying that on the 31st of May, Paulus had said 4 AM, and she says that then he changed to 11 PM on the 29th.

      “BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: Yes, 4 a.m. on May 31, he stated – I documented in my journal – that he stated to the police spokesperson that he picked Joran up at 4 a.m. Again, on June 17, I have it documented in my journal that they were going to question Paul that day about the 4 a.m. pick-up. And then it changed. That’s why I was so shocked that day that you and I went to his home. That was the first time that he had changed to it 11 p.m., to the 29th. So that’s just one example of many little details that are just driving me crazy now that I’m back home.”

      The train of thought and expression is not very clear, and picking up Joran at 4 AM on the 31st is not a date related to the day of the disappearance, so there is either some confusion or Mrs. H-T made a crucial mistake when referring to the annotations in her diary.

    6. Miss-Underestimated on March 1st, 2007 5:42 pm

      Good Job Klaas

      Okay Am I the only one that has a real problem with the corpse statement? They have said right there that Natalee was a corpse, and to add to that, there is evidence that would link them to her rape and murder.

      Aruba WTF are you waiting for?
      Hey Pauless why don’t you give Beth her daughter back?
      Perfuming the pigs doesn’t work anymore, you have all been found. Now Arlene, he said right here a corpse. What is so difficult with your legal system to lock them up?

      Yep, these words are part of Aruba’s legacy “no corpse no case”

      The whole lying bunch of em, RIH

    7. Maggie on March 1st, 2007 6:07 pm

      These are from the police statements of Deepak and Satish for May 31st. Conveniently Joran’s is missing. All three said they changed their stories after the guards were arrested and after the tape showed Natalee didn’t return to her hotel room,(June 15th or so) to we took them to the beach and left and Joran and her were at the fisherman’s huts. Now tell me , why were the cops questioning them about this on May 31st if they didn’t tell that story until the 15th and why is Joran’s statement missing? Do the cops have ESP?

      Deepak May 31st.
      On your question if Joran and the girl had stepped from my car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea;
      I will answer you no.

      Satish May 31st
      On your question if Joran and the girl had gotten out of the car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea;
      I answer you no. Joran and the girl never got out of Deepak’s car.

      As for Paulus’s statement. I believe Beth and her family arrived on the 31st around 3am and that is when Paulus made his statement about picking Joran up at 4am… not that he picked up Joran on the 31st at 4am. Other people there have given similar statements that, they too heard Paulus say that on that night.

    8. Maggie on March 1st, 2007 6:09 pm

      Another loonie tune..

      Joran’s June 13th police statement..

      On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman’s Hut, he answered:

      “I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

      To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
      “I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman’s Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

      Joran’s interview with Greta..
      VAN SUSTEREN: I understand that now but I understand that now. But last summer when you were in custody, I understand that now that you feel that way but when you were in custody last summer was there anything that you said about them, whether it’s true or false that accused them?

      VAN DER SLOOT: That accused them, just, no. I said that they, they dropped me off at my house and that they drove away with the girl, which wasn’t true.


      VAN DER SLOOT: And, but to accuse them directly, no, I never said anything like that.

      VAN SUSTEREN: So you never said that Deepak assaulted her or anything like that?

      VAN DER SLOOT: No.

      VAN SUSTEREN: Never said that you thought it might have happened or anything like that?

      VAN DER SLOOT: No.,2933,186707,00.html

    9. Carpe Noctem on March 1st, 2007 6:18 pm


      You called that one on the money.

      (withdrawal of K2 suit)

      The lying, murdering, raping Kalpoes
      attempt to weasel out of things…
      once again.

      Just like the Aruban criminal father/son
      tag team duo, Joran and Dear Ole
      Pappy Van der Sloot.

      People puh-leeze.

      Aruba – Boycott!


    10. Patti on March 1st, 2007 6:46 pm

      There were two witnesses present when Paulus said that he had pick up Joran at Mc Donalds at 4 am.

      Now that we know that, it is easier to understand why Paulus wanted the brothers to lie about dropping Natalee off at the Holiday Inn… Joran would have been the last person to have been with Natalee.

      I trust Beth and her journals and it’s lucky for her that she had two witnesses present that heard the same thing. Evidently, they testified at the hearing by which the court found that the police arrested Paulus with probable cause.

      The only place that I see some confusion is in the witnesses statements. According to Beth’s notes, Paulus picked up Joran at Mc Donalds. However, according to the witnesses (who spoke Dutch) Paulus said that he had picked up, both, Joran and Natalee at Mc Donalds at 4am and dropped Natalee off at the Holiday Inn. There may have been a language problem in their communications, but the witnesses (2), both, said that they heard Paulus say that.
      I, suppose, based on the eye-witness accounts of the things that he said, Paulus was arrested.

    11. Allan K on March 1st, 2007 7:19 pm

      You will never get at the truth with the Chief Van Der Stratten withholding information and half the ALE corrupt. Then even the Arubans and Dutch cops are related plus half the news announcers. Nobody in Aruba ever thinks to remove themselves from a case. That would not work in the US. It is almost an impossibility to get any justice there. I am so sorry Natalee went there.

    12. Patti on March 1st, 2007 7:31 pm


      I agree. The Holloways and Twittys never knew that they would be treated with such disdain. All they wanted was their daughter back… but, instead, they found themselves victims of a corrupt system of lies, a good ol’ boys club.

    13. Leslie on March 1st, 2007 8:47 pm

      I would say that if you make a written statement and then refuse to sign it you are admitting that it is a pack of lies.

    14. yoyo muffintop on March 1st, 2007 9:21 pm

      #13 – I would say that if the police write a summary of what you said, you read it and it’s not what you said, then yes, one would not sign a “pack of lies”.
      Got a link to Deepak or Satish’s hand written statement that they wrote themselves and refused to sign? Doubt it.


      SM:   Yoyo, are you kidding?   Do you think ALE has the suspects handwrite their own statements?   You know darn well the statements are all posted in the forum.   They are all witnessed by members of ALE whether the suspect signed or not.   (klaasend)

    15. yoyo muffintop on March 1st, 2007 10:08 pm

      #13 said it, I didn’t.

      And Carpe – There was a request by Dr Phil to have the judge replaced. He trying to weasel out of something? He should “take it like a man” and accecpt the judge originally assigned. What’s he scared of? Why is he cowering? Is he not a brave enough man to accept this judge?

      Or is it just standard legal “stuff”? Come on, you’re smarter than that.

    16. ben on March 2nd, 2007 6:07 am

      joran said satish,showed up and had two dogs with him and said satish did something to natalee,,words to that effect.but then denied saying that.who would make a lie up that that involed two dogs,,its to specific to be made up.The truth is buried in the lies,they went where they denie going,did what they denied doing.

    17. Carpe Noctem on March 2nd, 2007 7:14 am

      YoYo,why is it… I feel that you either are a Kalpoe, or very closely related? (lawyer or family member)

      Pop pop pop goes the weasel,
      cuz the weasel goes *P*O*P, bizzo! ;)

      Justice 4 Natalee (& Dr. Phil!)

    18. Carpe Noctem on March 2nd, 2007 9:15 am




      Separated only by a few minutes/paragraphs

      Interviewer: What does Natalee say?

      Joran van der Sloot: She said she *didn’t want to go back to her hotel*,
      and she wanted me to stay there with her because it was her last night and she didn’t want to go back to Alabama. She was having too much
      fun in Aruba.


      Interviewer: When you heard that a girl had gone missing on the beach, what did you think?

      Joran van der Sloot: Well, the first thing that popped into my head was (censored). What if something happened to her? What if she went swimming?

      ****I was thinking after everything she told me, she probably might have gone back to her hotel*****,
      hooked up with – gone to someone else, hooked up with someone else, and wanted to stay another day on the island.


      Joran hasn’t even WALKED BY “THE TRUTH” since he was born. He is a serial liar, and a full contact / open throttle psycopath.

      He has been taught by another successful psycopath,
      his pig slop trough of a dad.

      I think he’s THE RAPIST/MURDERER of Natalee, but Deepak and Satish, and Paulus are
      thoroughly involved as well. (hands on)

      My only question is: I wonder how long after they close the investigation as a cold case in a few months, how long will it take before a hunter/killer individual/team will be assigned to deactivate him?

      Even Peter De Vries said he will most likely be assassinated.

      God forgive me, I am counting the days, no qaulms whatsoever!!!

      That little son of a bitch is one of the leading candidates for a complimentary shell, I have ever seen. He did it. -J4N

    19. LilPuma on March 2nd, 2007 10:37 am

      14. YoYo: True. We know the police in Aruba do this. Beth and Dave had the same problem with Aruban police wanting them to sign incomplete and/or inaccurate statements.

      15. YoYo: In the US, if there is a conflict of interest, you can request a different judge. Perhaps you do not understand this idea. If the police chief or judge is a friend of the family of a suspect, he should not be allowed to run the investigation or rule in the case. Perhaps that’s why PM Oduber wanted van der Straaten replaced, initially wanting the case to be turned over to the FBI. In the US, a judge would not be allowed to visit the home of a suspect, maybe have some lunch or a cup of coffee and a muffin, and be present to change the scope of a search warrant to benefit a suspect. This seems SOP in Aruba, but not here. Can you comprehend that a bungled investigation that was handled by police and judges who are friends of the van der Sloots might appear to be a cover up?

    20. Maggie on March 2nd, 2007 1:12 pm

      On that statement of Joran’s about Deepak, VanderStraten is the one who gave it, You know the good family friend of the Sloots, that Paulus knew and worked with for years. The statement that Beth had was taken in English and translated in Dutch and she was asked to sign it, but when later found out it left some things out, so she gave a new statement.

      Good find Carpe, he contradicts himself constantly. She didn’t want to go back to her hotel, but he thought she went back to her hotel after everything she told him.

    21. Richard on March 2nd, 2007 1:18 pm

      #19 (Lil Puma) … Oduber initially opposed asking the FBI to help with the case. He said it would be solved in a week.

    22. cara scott on March 2nd, 2007 2:08 pm

      Can I re ask my earlier question,Did the key from the HI,get used?thought the swipe key to the hotel door may show any room activity? &provide a time line ?

    23. dennisintn on March 2nd, 2007 6:09 pm

      it was determined that the girls each had a card and they commingled them inside the door. all card activity has been accounted for that night.

    24. cara scott on March 2nd, 2007 7:37 pm

      Thanks for the feedback,thought that the card use may have shown a timeline .

    25. sharon on March 3rd, 2007 8:20 am

      yoyo — thank you.

      The fact that you are going into overdrive with your spin and beginning another of your internal combustion acts allows those of us who are demanding justice for Natalee Holloway to have confidence that justice is around the corner:-)

      How’s ‘the girl’, yoyo? Where’s ‘the girl’, yoyo?

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It