RSSJoran Van der Sloot (Layered Voice Analysis): So the Media Thinks he is Suddenly Telling the Truth, huh?
Voice Analysis: Joran’s “Primetime” interview.
Do you think Joran Van der Sloot was telling the truth during recent interviews?
Are people suddenly banking on the fact that just because Joran spoke to the media that somehow this equates to the truth?
Did Joran and Natalee ever go to the beach? Why does Joran conveniently leave out any discussion of going to the light house while the Kalopoe’s state they did?
What do you think Joran’s intentions really were?
The following voice analysis is rather interesting: (click on images to see originals, transcript is underneath)
Layered Voice Analysis Report on Interview of Joran Van der Sloot
File: Joran Van der Sloot on ABC’s “Primetime”
Report Date: February 28, 2006
Website: www.v-lva.com
(Below is the text from the three page report)
LVA Definitions:
LVA 6.50 analyzes statements and places them on a TRUTH spectrum output that indicates
the statement’s distance from 100% mathematical accuracy. The further down the LVA
spectrum the statement falls, the further the statement is from the complete truth.
This spectrum runs as follows:
TRUTH – NOT SURE – INNACCURACY – PROBABLE FALSE – FALSE STATEMENT
LVA software also has a DECEPTION spectrum output. The further down the DECEPTION spectrum the statement falls, the higher the indication the subject is being deceptive.
This spectrum runs as follows:
NO DECEPTION INDICATED – INCONCLUSIVE – INC+ (HIGHLY SUSPECT FOR DECEPTION) – DECEPTION INDICATED
Use of the above terms, from the TRUTH and DECEPTION spectrums in ALL UPPER CASE letters represents the data outputs of the LVA software.
Use of these terms in lower case letters indicates the LVA analyst’s findings based on the
data outputs, training and experience using LVA.
While the definitions of these LVA indications have very specific meanings as qualified by a
variety of data factors, for the purposes of this report standard dictionary definitions of the
above terms are sufficient to accurately convey the meaning of these LVA indications.
LVA Data Outputs:
Joran’s statement indicates heightened use of IMAGINATION throughout the interview.
Reporter asks, “You were not courting her, you were not pursuing her?”
Joran responds, “Not at all, not at any point.” (LVA Segment 49)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / HIGHLY SUSPECT for DECEPTION
Reporter asks, ”Were you trying to get Natalee drunk?”
Joran responds, “Not at all.” (LVA Segment 57)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / HIGHLY SUSPECT for DECEPTION
Joran explains, “I told Deepak to drive to the lighthouse.” (LVA Segment 92)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / HIGHLY SUSPECT for DECEPTION
Joran claims Natalee said, “No, no, no, I don’t want to go to the hotel.” (LVA Segment 122)
LVA Analysis: PROBABLE FALSE / DECEPTION INDICATED
Reporter asks, “Was Natalee more drunk than you’re letting on?”
Joran responds,”No, not at all.” (LVA Segment 274)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / DECEPTION INDICATED
Reporter asks, “Did you harm Natalee Holloway?”
Joran responds, “No.” (LVA Segment 303)
LVA Analysis: PROBABLE FALSE / DECEPTION INDICATED
Reporter asks, “Did you see Natalee Holloway in distress?”
Joran responds, “No.” (LVA Segment 305)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / HIGHLY SUSPECT for DECEPTION
Joran states, “There is not one girl who will ever come forward and say something like that, because it’s just not true.” (LVA Segment 444)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / DECEPTION INDICATED
Reporter asks, “Have you ever gotten a girl drunk, so, you could make advances on her?”
Joran responds, “No, never.” (LVA Segment 446)
LVA Analysis: INACCURACY / HIGHLY SUSPECT for DECEPTION
LVA Analysis:
LVA analysis of Joran Van der Sloot’s statement, the ABC’s “Primetime” interview by reporter Chris Cuomo, indicates that Joran provided deceptive and/or inaccurate answers on the relevant questions throughout the interview.
In the above results on relevant segments of the interview relating specifically to his involvement in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, LVA analysis consistently indicates that Joran Van der Sloot is deceptive and/or inaccurate in his statements:
Joran indicates inaccuracy or deception in many statements related to Natalee’s state of mind and/or level of intoxication.
Joran indicates inaccuracy or deception in many of his statements related to his level of interest in Natalee and his description of her pursuing him throughout the evening.
Joran exhibits stress and high tension in discussing his house as it relates to his intentions to take Natalee there. Joran indicates deception when saying that Natalee didn’t want to return to the hotel.
Joran exhibits excitement in discussing his intention to have sex with Natalee.
Joran exhibits extreme stress in discussing his conversations with Deepak in the car the evening Natalee disappeared.
Joran indicates inaccuracy when stating that Natalee wanted/agreed to go to the lighthouse and shows high stress when he mentions not going to the lighthouse.
Joran indicates inaccuracy when stating that he has not taken advantage of other girls and used alcohol to help his efforts.
Report Conclusions:
LVA data outputs and analysis indicate Joran Van der Sloot is deceptive and inaccurate in his account of the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
LVA data outputs and analysis indicates Joran Van der Sloot is deceptive and inaccurate in his account of the role he played in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
Joran indicates PROBABLE FALSE / DECEPTION INDICATED and INACCURACY / HIGHLY SUSPECT for DECEPTION data outputs on the relevant questions about ‘harming’ and ‘seeing Natalee in distress’ respectively. These responses are not consistent with truthful and accurate responses and deserve the greatest scrutiny.
Joran Van der Sloot should be considered a suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
Posted March 10, 2006 by Scared Monkeys Aruba, Deepak Kalpoe, Joran Van der Sloot, Natalee Holloway | one comment |
Heather Teschler, Plea Deal reached in Christine Rudy Murder
Heather Teschler is facing felony and misdemeanor charges in the death of Christine Rudy. Heather Teschler will most likely be a witness in the states case against Christine Rudy’s husband, Shaun Rudy.
(more)
Joe Tacopina, Live & Direct: There is not a single nexus to New York State
‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’ for March 8, 2006
There’s absolutely no basis for there to be any litigation in New York.
JOE TACOPINA, JORAN VAN DER SLOOT’S U.S. ATTORNEY: Well, two things, Rita. Fact: There is not a single nexus to New York State. There’s not a witness who resides in New York. None of the parties reside in New York. The instance alleged in the complaint didn’t occur in New York.
Read more
Diario: Judge denies attorney Carlo’s request to declare Joran van der Sloot no longer a suspect
Joran Van der Sloot still a suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway as judge denies Joran’s petition. One wonders how Joran’s civil defense attorney, Joe Tacopina, can make the statements that no one can call his client a predator or murderer when his client is a lead suspect in a crime that is a potential sexual assault and murder. If judge Smid of Curaà §ao said its ok to continue to call Joran a suspect, what exactly does everyone think he’s is suspected of doing?
Interesting loss for Joran Van der Sloot and really the first since he was let out of jail in late summer.
HUEZ A NENGA PETICION DI ABOGADO CARLO, DI DECLARA JORAN VAN DER SLOOT COMO NO SOSPECHOSO
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Wednesday, the judge’s decision became known, in the case which attorney Carlo brought forward, representing Joran van der Sloot.
Attorney Antony Carlo started a case a few weeks back, to request that the Public Prosecutor declare that his client Joran van der Sloot is officially no longer a suspect in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, or to instruct the Public Prosecutor to set a period of time within which they have to start a case against his client.
Both petitions were denied by judge Smid of Curaà §ao.
(Hat Tip: GetaGrip)
Superior Court rejects attorney Carlo’s demand
Penal investigation against Joran van der Sloot is not closed
Bondia, March 9, 2006
ORANJESTAD — Last Monday, attorney Carlo started a case in which he asked the Superior Court to close the penal case against his client, Joran van der Sloot.
For this case, a judge from Curaà §ao traveled to Aruba, in which Mr. Carlo as well as the representative of the Public Prosecutor widely debated in court. Treatment of the case took place behind closed doors, which made it difficult for Bon Dia Aruba to cover it. However, an investigation conducted by Bon Dia Aruba shows that Mr. Carlo, among other facts that there is no new developments in the investigation, argued that they have to close the penal investigation against Joran van der Sloot.
Tuesday, the Superior Court handed down the sentence in Curaà §ao and yesterday, the verdict was finally known. Bond Dia Aruba has understood that the Superior Court denied Mr. Carlo’s demand. This means that the Superior Court is not closing the penal investigation against Joran van der Sloot.
(Hat Tip: Get a Grip)
Joran Van der Sloot, Deepak & Satish Kalpoe: Webs of Deception
(Vanderbilt – 06)
The question lately has been, why did Deepak feel the need to lie?
Why would Joran feel the need to lie about something so insignificant as leaving a girl on the beach that he was willing to go to prison for that lie?
How does Satish play in to all of this?
Mickey John stated over the summer that Deepak told him that the initial lies were made up by Joran and Paulus when they all got together.
Deepak told Nadria they told the lie “to protect his friend.”
Maybe all three lied, because all three are involved and have something to lie about.
Innocent people do not lie; however, guilty ones do deceive.
Posted March 9, 2006 by Scared Monkeys Aruba, Deepak Kalpoe, Joran Van der Sloot, Natalee Holloway | 60 comments |
